Mississippians Overwhelmingly Voted Down a Jim Crow–Era Election Provision

Voters slowly make their way through the long line Tupelo Miss., on Nov. 3, 2020.Thomas Wells/The Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal via AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Mississippi voters overwhelmingly supported a ballot initiative on Tuesday to dismantle a Jim Crow–era constitutional provision that was created to preserve white political power in the state. 

The constitutional amendment required candidates seeking statewide office to win the popular vote, in addition to a majority of Mississippi’s 122 state House districts. It was created in 1890 at a constitutional convention that was convened with the goal of disenfranchising Black voters. Several Jim Crow provisions were added to the state’s constitution that year, including literacy tests, a poll tax, and separate-but-equal school districts.

As Mississippi Today points out, although these provisions remained in the state’s constitution, they had all been found unconstitutional by federal law, and were therefore nullified—except for the election requirement, which was arguably more subtle and therefore survived the evolution of federal discrimination law. Still, its white supremacist intentions were never actually hidden. The election provision received vocal support from state Rep. James K. Vardaman in 1890, who was elected on his white supremacist beliefs and was known as the “Great White Hope” in Mississippi. In praise of the convention, he said: “There is no use to equivocate or lie about the matter. Mississippi’s constitutional convention of 1890 was held for no other purpose than to eliminate the nigger from politics—not the ignorant and vicious, as some apologists would have you believe, but the nigger. Let the world know it just as it is…. In Mississippi, we have in our constitution legislated against the racial peculiarities of the Negro…. When that device fails, we will resort to something else.”

Over the past several years, the provision has gotten more attention. It came up in national conversation in 2018, when Mike Espy, a Black man, first challenged Cindy Hyde-Smith for retiring Sen. Thad Cochran’s seat. It came up again last year when then-Attorney General Jim Hood, a Democrat, ran against then-Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves, for governor. During the campaign, the National Democratic Redistricting Committee, an organization led by Eric Holder, the first Black attorney general, backed a lawsuit to challenge the provision filed by four Black Mississippi voters. “This racist electoral scheme achieved, and continues to achieve, the framers’ goals by tying the statewide election process to the power structure of the House,” the lawsuit stated. “So long as white Mississippians controlled the House, they would also control the elections of statewide officials.” The lawsuit failed, though the courts signaled that they may step in should the race require a state House vote, and Reeves won the governorship. Even though the last race that triggered a vote in the state House was in 1999, the provision remained a stain on Mississippi’s democracy—until last night, as a whopping 78 percent of voters eliminated the provision for good. 

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate