Mastermind Behind Arizona Immigration Law Strikes Again

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Kris Kobach—the Kansas lawyer behind Arizona’s harsh immigration law—has helped put another punitive measure on the books. A small Nebraska town passed a local referendum on Monday to exclude illegal immigrants from jobs and rental homes. The measure, which Kobach helped author, would bar landlords from renting to illegal immigrants, require the city to screen renters for their immigration status, and would require businesses use a federal database to ensure that only legal immigrants are allowed to work. 

Interestingly enough, the city council of Fremont, a town of 25,000, had actually opposed passing the measure, which was passed by a popular vote of about 57 percent. It turns out the Hispanic population has jumped from virtually non-existent to about 2,000 in about two decades—though no one knows how many of these newcomers are actually illegal immigrants. And some reports have suggested that older residents have been the driving force behind the law, concerned that Nebraska communities like Fremont just “no longer look or feel the way they once did.” While many conservative legislators in many states have vowed to pass copycat laws in the wake of Arizona, local ordinances may end up getting on the books more quickly, given such deep-seated wariness about immigrants and minority populations in small-town America. 

The Nebraska branch of the ACLU has already vowed to file suit against the measure and block its enforcement, claiming it is discriminatory, promotes racial profiling, and violates federal law. And local opponents fear the legislation will be costly to defend, and they’re right to be concerned. Kobach has helped defend similar laws in Farmers Branch, Texas, and Hazleton, Pennsylvania, both of which are still tied up in the court system. Dallas Branch has already racked up $3.2 million in legal fees in defending its anti-immigration law. And it’s local taxpayers in these towns who will end up having to bear the burden.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate