Even Ray Kelly Is Now Convinced Cops Need to Wear Body-Cams

Former NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly—who once warned against police officers being equipped with body-cameras—is now coming out in support of the recording technology. Kelly’s reversal, he noted on ABC’s This Week on Sunday, was prompted by the video in South Carolina that caught police officer Michael Slager fatally shooting Walter Scott.

“It has changed my mind,” Kelly told host George Stephanopoulos. “Because we have to assume that this officer would not act the way he did if in fact he had a body camera that was recording.”

Prior to the video’s emergence last week, local reports of the shooting appeared to largely rely on the officer’s account alone: Slager told authorities he had “felt threatened” by Scott and defended his actions as nothing more than a traffic stop gone wrong. The video’s eventual publication, which clearly showed Slager shooting Scott in the back eight times as he attempted to flee, quickly lead to his arrest and murder charge.

“I think it is a game changer,” Kelly said of the video. “What you will see is a movement now by many more police departments to go to cameras. There are issues with it, there are problems with it, but this trumps all of those problems.”

As head of the NYPD, Kelly was a fierce defender of the department’s controversial use of stop-and-frisk tactics and credited the program as a major factor in the city’s declining crime rate. He also argued outfitting all officers with body-cameras would only thwart their abilities to perform their jobs properly. “I think we have to tread carefully in this area,” he said in September. “I think cameras will make police officers hesitate and that can be a good thing or a bad thing.”


ABC Breaking US News | US News Videos

OUR DEADLINE MATH PROBLEM

It’s risky, but also unavoidable: A full one-third of the dollars that we need to pay for the journalism you rely on has to get raised in December. A good December means our newsroom is fully staffed, well-resourced, and on the beat. A bad one portends budget trouble and hard choices.

The December 31 deadline is drawing nearer, and if we’re going to have any chance of making our goal, we need those of you who’ve never pitched in before to join the ranks of MoJo donors.

We simply can’t afford to come up short. There is no cushion in our razor-thin budget—no backup, no alternative sources of revenue to balance our books. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the fierce journalism we do. That’s why we need you to show up for us right now.

payment methods

OUR DEADLINE MATH PROBLEM

It’s risky, but also unavoidable: A full one-third of the dollars that we need to pay for the journalism you rely on has to get raised in December. A good December means our newsroom is fully staffed, well-resourced, and on the beat. A bad one portends budget trouble and hard choices.

The December 31 deadline is drawing nearer, and if we’re going to have any chance of making our goal, we need those of you who’ve never pitched in before to join the ranks of MoJo donors.

We simply can’t afford to come up short. There is no cushion in our razor-thin budget—no backup, no alternative sources of revenue to balance our books. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the fierce journalism we do. That’s why we need you to show up for us right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate