Should Paris Allow a Massive Climate Protest Right Now?

Even after the deadly terrorist attacks, global warming activists are planning to go ahead with large protests and civil disobedience in the French capital two weeks from now.

French President Francoise Hollande and French Prime Minister Manuel Vallse observe a minute of silence for the victims of the Paris terror attacks.Maxppp via ZUMA

 

Massive climate rallies in Paris should go ahead as planned: That’s the message activists will take to French authorities during a private meeting scheduled for Tuesday morning, as they double-down on plans for large demonstrations during an upcoming global warming summit.

Following Friday night’s terrorist attacks that killed 129 people in Paris, a big question mark has been hanging over which, if any, large protests would be allowed to take place during the high-stakes climate negotiations that are set to begin November 30. But during a hastily convened meeting Monday, climate activist groups resolved to turn out on the streets in large numbers.

“It is absolutely necessary that we make sure civil society actions can happen.”

“It is absolutely necessary that we make sure civil society actions can happen,” said Juliette Rousseau, a spokesperson for Coalition Climat 21, a major umbrella group backed by American environmental organizations such as 350.org and Avaaz. Coalition Climat 21 is helping to coordinate a major climate march on November 29, as well as various “non-violent direct action” events, including so-called “blockades.” Literature promoting the events calls for protesters to “occupy public space with our disobedient bodies.” On December 12, for example, demonstrators plan to form several human chains around the Place de la République in Paris. Following Friday’s attacks, the Place de la République became the site of spontaneous memorials to the dead and injured.

Hundreds pay tribute to victims of terrorist attacks in Paris at the Place de la République. Cedric Bufkens/Wostok Press/ Maxppp via ZUMA

According to Rousseau, the groups will present their plans to French security officials in a meeting scheduled for Tuesday morning, local time.

Rousseau said via telephone from Paris that the groups are “ready to work on the conditions, and to make sure safety is ensured, but basically we’re moving forward with our plans.” In a statement emailed later, Rousseau’s organization said: “COP21 can not take place without the participation or without the mobilizations of civil society in France.”

The decision to press ahead with original plans, however, seems to be at odds with what the French government has said about events that were intended to coincide with the international climate talks.

“[The summit] will go ahead with reinforced security measures,” French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the day after the attacks. “This is an absolutely necessary step in the battle against climate change and of course it will take place.” But on Monday, French officials appeared to suggest they would block rallies and side events that were scheduled to take place outside the main negotiations. Prime Minister Manuel Valls told RTL radio that “a series of demonstrations planned will not take place and it will be reduced to the negotiations…a lot of concerts and festivities will be canceled.”

In the hours after the attack, Paris police announced on Twitter that all public street events and demonstrations were suspended until further notice. An emergency midnight cabinet meeting granted sweeping security powers to authorities operating in Paris, including the power to “order the temporary closure of places of public assembly like concert halls and theaters,” according to The New York Times. A state of emergency was declared after the attacks on Friday, and now French President Francois Hollande has said parliament should extend that order by three months.

In a message sent Monday afternoon, Nicolas Haeringer, an official with 350.org, stated, “We fully share their concerns about public safety—just as we fully oppose any unnecessary crackdowns on civil liberties and minority populations.”

Alice Jay, campaign director at Avaaz, added that her group had “reaffirmed our commitment to doing all we can to ensure that Paris will join cities around the world in hosting a safe, inspiring and open march on November 29th.”

 

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate