No, Little Bugs Did Not Set California on Fire

Though an easy scapegoat, bark beetles might actually be helping forests.

A mountain pine beetleJohn Ulan/The Canadian Press/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


California’s wildfires can be traced back to a tiny bug—or at least that’s what Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) would have you think. So far this year, the state has seen at least 4,500 wildfires burning more than 200,000 acres of forest, resulting in hundreds of evacuations and at least one human death. On Tuesday, the senator tweeted about how an uptick of bark beetles in her state has helped cause the blazes:

Feinstein asked the US Department of Agriculture to allocate $38 million to fund tree removal projects in hopes of quelling the potential for future fires.

As the US Forest Service wrote in a June press release, four years of drought, warmer temperatures, and “a dramatic rise in bark beetle infestation” have weakened the woods and made them dangerously dry. More than 66 million new trees have died in the Southern Sierra Nevada since 2010.

“Bark beetles” describes several species of rice-sized insects that lay their eggs in evergreen trees, choking off the supply of nutrients from the roots of a tree to its limbs. Droughts make trees more susceptible to these insects, and California (along with Colorado, Montana, and other Western States) has seen major increases in bark beetle infestations over the last decade. Nearly 50 million of our country’s 850 million forest acres have experienced beetle outbreaks.

BEETLEMANIA

From 2000 to 2014, bark beetles destroyed large swaths of forests in the American West—and they’re not done yet.

So Western forests right now are crippled by both drought and insects—but does that mean insect epidemics actually increase the chance of wildfires? Feinstein and the folks at CalFire seem to think so.

But turns out the science isn’t so simple. A study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2014 by four University of Colorado researchers examined the belief that the dead trees from mountain pine beetle outbreaks exacerbated wildfires. “Although MPB infestation and fire activity both independently increased in conjunction with recent warming,” they concluded, “our results demonstrate that the annual area burned in the western United States has not increased in direct response to bark beetle activity.” Several other studies, including one of lodgepole pine and spruce trees in the central Rockies, have led to similar conclusions.

This is because the parched and broiling conditions already set the stage for increased wildfires, with or without the beetles. Colorado State University biogeography professor Jason Sibold explained it me this way:

The road is icy, and a truck crashes up here on the road. Well a car crashes back there on the road. The car didn’t crash because of the truck; they both crashed because it’s icy!

So, too, he says, beetles and wildfires “are both occurring because we have hotter, drier, longer summers.” (I should add that at the time, Sibold was talking specifically about Rocky Mountain forests.)

Why does this matter? Well, because as Feinstein’s request makes clear, some people think tree removal projects might help stop beetle infestations and prevent wildfires. But others, like Diana Six and California’s Eric Barber, scientists I profiled in this feature about bark beetles and forest ecology, think that insect infestations have a lot to teach us about climate change—and that spending a lot of federal dollars digging up dead trees isn’t the best way to understand these lessons.

Policy “should focus on societal adaptation to the effects of recent increases in wildfire activity related to increased drought,” argue the researchers of the University of Colorado study mentioned above. And that might include learning to live with both beetles and more fires—rather than trying to prevent them.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate