After a Historic and Deadly Fire Season, California Homeowners Struggle to Stay Insured

A state report finds that “insurance is increasingly difficult to obtain and, if available, is unaffordable for many.”

A wildfire consumes a Ventura home in December, 2017. Jae C. Hong/AP

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

The spate of deadly wildfires that tore through California in the second half of 2017 scorched more than 21,000 homes. As the millions of residents living at the cusp of the state’s forests and mountains renew their insurance policies, many have been disappointed by price increases, or worse: denial of coverage. According to a report out Thursday, the California Department of Insurance (CDI) has seen an uptick in complaints from homeowners and public officials that “homeowners’ insurance coverage in the wildland-urban interface is increasingly difficult to obtain and, if available, is unaffordable for many.”

Between 2010 and 2016, the agency found a 249 percent increase in consumer complaints related to renewals, specifically in zip codes designated by Cal Fire as having the greatest wildfire risk. This is coupled with a 217 percent uptick in complaints about rising premiums from clients in the same areas. 

“Insurers are increasingly using computer models to assess the risk of fires for individual homes and deciding that homes in some areas face too high a risk,” Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones stated in a press release. “In the wake of last year’s wildfires, we may see more areas of the state where insurers decline to write.”

The San Francisco Chronicle spoke with Oakland hills resident Anil Prasad who was denied parts of his home insurance coverage because the fire hazard was too high.

The company offered to reinstate his policy but said it wouldn’t cover damage from fires, lightning, windstorms, hail, explosions, riots, civil commotion, aircraft or vehicle crashes, smoke, vandalism, malicious mischief, or volcanic eruptions.

“It seems like the only thing they’ll cover is someone sneezing on my house,” Prasad said.

The CDI report found that third-party wildfire-risk models are not regulated, nor is there a system in place for consumers to appeal a wildfire-risk model score. Additionally, most insurers do not consider wildfire mitigation conducted by homeowners or the community—which involves managing risks like the amount of easily ignited brush on land—either for underwriting or offering a premium credit. The state department is suggesting new legislation to protect the insured from these issues.

An estimated 3.6 million people live in California’s WUI, and this number has been steadily increasing in recent decades, according to the US Forest Service.  “Californians are facing more severe, more unpredictable, and more frequent wildfires,” Jones said. “Add to the equation, increasing development in areas more vulnerable to fire and you can see why wildfires are now an everyday threat to life and property for Californians.”

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate