Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

In an unprecedented display of 21st century comity and bipartisanship, I would like to fully endorse Andrew Stuttaford’s takedown of Sen. Jim DeMint (R-SC), who remains defiantly unhappy that his proposal last year to ban taxpayer money from being used to “bail out” foreign countries was voted down:

All one can say is that, on this occasion, the Senate got it right. Senator DeMint may not like it, but we live in an economically interdependent world….Greece’s problems are not just Greece’s, and the threat that they pose to economic recovery stretches far beyond that unfortunate country’s borders and, for that matter, the frontiers of the wretched eurozone.

The current weakness in the global economy is a clear and present danger (to borrow a phrase) to the dangerously fragile, dangerously indebted U.S. economy and to this nation’s wider strategic, political, and economic interests. For all its flaws, the IMF is the best tool we have to help countries (usually on tough terms — that’s why they are rioting in Greece, Senator) that have got themselves in the mess they have, a mess that threatens us, too. Seen in this light, crippling the IMF makes no sense — no sense at all.

Oddly enough, I wrote nearly those exact same words last night for distribution via email tomorrow. It’s part of the answer to Felix Salmon’s question, “Why should Americans care about Greece?” (For the other part of the answer, sign up for my newsletter! In addition to the rest of the answer, you also get bonus cats.)

What’s more, I think Stuttaford is right about this despite the fact that even with IMF help Greece is likely doomed. In fact, as pessimistic as I’ve been about Greece for a long time, I’ve grown more pessimistic as time passes. At this point, unless the EU is almost literally willing to make Greece a long-term ward of the state and provide the massive amounts of funding needed to pull this off, it’s hard to see any endgame that doesn’t include debt default and Greece’s exit from the Euro, with all the attendant chaos that implies. The IMF rescue delays the day of reckoning, which might be worthwhile in the same way that delaying GM’s collapse until the economy improves might have been worthwhile, but I don’t see how it eliminates it. I sure hope I’m wrong, though.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate