A Blast From the Past: The Media vs. Al Gore

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

Paul Krugman writes in passing that reporters who covered the 2000 election “liked Bush and didn’t like Gore, and as a result they treated Bush with kid gloves while gleefully passing on every smear against his opponent.” Andrew Gelman pushes back:

Far be it from me to question something that was “obviously true to anyone who lived through it”—as a non-T.V. owner, I think it’s safe to say that I did not actually live through the 2000 election campaign—but . . . really??? Even if it’s true that reporters liked Bush and didn’t like Gore (again, I’d like to see the evidence), one thing we do know is that twice as many journalists are Democrats as Republicans.

Hoo boy. I’ve told Bob Somerby before that I think he obsesses too much over the 2000 election, but I guess someone needs to if the media’s treatment of Gore in the 2000 campaign still isn’t common knowledge. So for those of you who think Krugman was over the top, here are some reading assignments:

  • Robert Parry, writing in real time, on the press corps’ contempt for Gore (“The national news media have repeatedly portrayed the vice president…as a willful liar who may even live in a world of his own delusions”).
  • Evgenia Peretz, seven years later, describing the treatment of Gore by Kit Seelye, Ceci Connolly, and other campaign reporters (“They just wanted to tear Gore apart,” said a major network correspondent).
  • Jonathan Schwartz summarizing the great debate incident (“The media groaned, howled and laughed almost every time Al Gore said something”).

And for the longer version of all this, there’s Bob’s own “How He Got There” — not a finished product yet, but up to Chapter Six anyway. Read and be amazed.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate