Democrats Still Uneasy Over Playing Political Hardball

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Republicans, as we know, have promised to block Richard Cordray as head of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. This isn’t because they have anything in particular against Cordray. They’ve promised to block anyone unless Democrats agree to changes that would essentially make the CFPB toothless. They’ve done the same for nominees to the National Labor Relations Board. The CFPB can’t legally operate without a director, and the NLRB can’t legally operate without a quorum, so, as Adam Serwer puts it, this is essentially a way to nullify a pair of agencies they happen to dislike “through procedural extortion.”

Dave Weigel is puzzled. “I continue to ask why Democrats didn’t get concessions on a few nominees in exchange for the filibuster punt,” he writes today. Unfortunately, I think the answer isn’t hard to find: Harry Reid didn’t have the votes for filibuster reform and Mitch McConnell knew it. What’s more, Reid himself didn’t seem to have the stomach for a filibuster fight in the first place. If Reid had demanded action on the CFPB and the NLRB, McConnell would have just laughed it off. It would have been a bluff and he knew it.

Democrats could have gotten more out of this. They could have gotten real filibuster reform, or, failing that, at least some concessions in return for a compromise. But they chickened out. Even after winning the fiscal cliff battle, and then forcing Republicans to back down over the debt ceiling, Dems still didn’t understand the value of playing hardball. It was an opportunity missed.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate