Tweet of the Day: Most Obamacare Users Won’t Pay Much More For Coverage Than They Did Last Year

Test Ticker

Please support Mother Jones with a year-end donation. The truth is, we're a long way from our $600,000 goal, and we have to get as close as we can by Tuesday so we don't have to make hard decisions come January. If you value our reporting, please consider pitching in today.

$600,000

We still need to raise 400,000: Whether you can give $5 or $500, it all matters.

Please support Mother Jones with a year-end donation. We need to raise $600,000, or get as close as we can, by Tuesday so we don't need to make hard decisions come January. Whether you can give $5 or $500, it all makes a difference.

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

This is from a guy who works for a healthcare advocacy group in New Mexico:

Just got off the phone w/ a consumer who was crying bc she couldn’t afford a 25% increase. With subsidies, her premium went down 1%. https://t.co/KYR4uhW6tC

— Colin Baillio (@colinb1123) October 25, 2016

Getting panicked calls all day about premium hikes. Every person I talked to was shielded by subsidies or on employer plan. #headlinesmatter

— Colin Baillio (@colinb1123) October 25, 2016

I don’t want to minimize the pain that this year’s premium hikes are going to cause for a subset of insurance buyers. But the vast majority of low-to-mid-income Obamacare users are eligible for federal subsidies—and as premiums go up, so do their subsidies. They may end up paying a bit more in 2017 for their health coverage, but probably no more than a few percent.

So yes: headlines matter. Or, at the very least, the first few paragraphs of news stories matter. Coverage of this issue should make it clear that the average price people pay will go up much less than 25 percent, and for low-income folks it probably won’t go up at all.