Legacy of Ashes: Secrecy and Screwups

An eye-opening new history of the CIA uncovers an intelligence agency out of control.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Legacy of Ashes: The History of the CIA
By Tim Weiner. Doubleday. $27.95

In 1969, the Central Intelligence Agency informed President Richard Nixon that the Soviets lacked the ability to launch a knockout nuclear first strike. Outraged that this undermined their plans for an antiballistic missile system, White House hawks ordered the agency to, in the words to then-CIA director Richard Helms, “trim the evidence.” The intel was buried and the ABM plans went forward. “[T]he agency was tailoring its work to fit the pattern of White House policy,” writes Tim Weiner, hinting that the now-infamous “slam dunk” case for invading Iraq wasn’t the first time the agency told the White House what it wanted to hear—and probably not the last, either.

Legacy of Ashes is an epic, eye-opening history of an agency out of control. Weiner presents 60 years of bungled covert operations, blatant criminality, lying to the public, and breathtaking incompetence. This includes much of what has recently been confirmed by the CIA itself in last week’s “family jewels” disclosure, including attempts to assassinate Fidel Castro and other foreign leaders, the surveillance of journalists such as Michael Getler and Jack Anderson, and widespread spying on of anti-Vietnam War activists and groups allegedly “controlled” by the Soviet Union. He also conclusively disproves the myth of CIA omnipotence, long held by defenders and detractors alike. Even though it’s meddled in its share of world events, the CIA has also been repeatedly surprised by them, from China’s entry into the Korean War and the fall of the Berlin Wall to the rise of militant Islam, and of course, September 11.

Weiner, a two-time Pulitzer winner who’s covered the agency for two decades (and who is married to a senior fellow at the National Security Archive), wonders if a secret intelligence service is inherently incompatible with an open democracy. “How do you serve the truth by lying? How do you spread democracy by deceit?” Unfortunately, he doesn’t offer any ideas for how the CIA might be reformed. But his silence suggests that the agency, held unaccountable for so long, may be beyond repair.


If you buy a book using a Bookshop link on this page, a small share of the proceeds supports our journalism.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate