MotherJones JF93: Ballooning statistics

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As part of his six-month stint abroad every year, Brice Atkinson, a contractor at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), surveys health officials to determine how many times a country’s typical couple has sex.

Atkinson belongs to a staff of demographers, health officials, economists, sociologists, and private contractors who spent nearly $40 million in 1991 distributing 842,106,000 condoms to the developing world for family planning and AIDS prevention. The number of condoms each country received is based on a survey of its coital frequency rate. Although the generally accepted average is 100 times per year, in a recent compilation, Brazil topped the list with an average CFR of 97; Ghana was at the bottom with 14.

“In every country the men feel that they are unique and that they make love more frequently or their penises are larger and longer,” Atkinson says. “If you ask a guy how many times he’s had sex in a week he’ll usually say seven. The surveyor writes that number down and then quickly asks, ‘How many times have you had sex this week?’ The man will respond something like, ‘Well, this week only twice because I had a cold.’ We can be pretty sure that the second number is more accurate.”

The irony surrounding USAID’s overseas family-planning programs is that they would never be accepted domestically. During election years especially, agency officials worry themselves sick that a Jesse Helms or a Bill Dannemeyer will take an interest in their work.

“Birth control is less controversial abroad,” says population office director Duff Gillespie. “There are blinking billboards encouraging vasectomies, a soccer team with a stylized rubber as a mascot, and full-page condom ads in newspapers.”

USAID condoms come in two sizes. “The 49s and 52s (mm in diameter) have served us well,” says another agency official, Carl Hemmer. Forty-niners are distributed to Asian countries, and the 52s are offered everywhere else. “That’s traditional judgment more than scientific,” Hemmer adds.

Now there’s a proposal by a foreign manufacturer for 55s. “We don’t have fitting salons,” Hemmer says. “The size debate is measuring male egos rather than other parts of the anatomy.”

The size issue caused a brouhaha recently in Italy, when Health Minister Francesco de Lorenzo announced that the smallest regulation size for condoms sold in Italy was larger than in the rest of Europe. The newspaper Il Giornale blared, “At least Italy is maxi in something,” while L’Unita, the newspaper of the former Communist Party, suggested that foreigners might want to bring their own condoms when visiting. De Lorenzo later retracted his statement when it was discovered that Italy’s condoms were the same as those everywhere else.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate