Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


So said Pete Wilson this summer as he announced his presidential candidacy in front of the Statue of Liberty. But an examination of the accomplishments trumpeted in his campaign literature shows Wilson’s policies have been inconsistent, self-serving, and in some cases, downright illegal:

Pete Wilson was the first governor in the nation to start dismantling affirmative action programs.

Tough words from a longtime architect of civic and statewide affirmative action programs. As mayor of San Diego in 1972, Wilson helped pass an initiative aimed at increasing the number of minorities employed by the city. “We are interested in employing black and brown talent,” he told the San Diego Union.

Since 1991, Gov. Wilson has signed at least 24 bills containing affirmative action provisions. And as recently as October 1994, Wilson stated he has “long supported [minority] set-asides.”

Pete Wilson was also the first governor to sign into law a “Three Strikes, You’re Out” bill to lock up career criminals.

This ostensibly tough anti-crime measure has clogged the courts and saddled California with an extraordinary financial burden. Since Wilson took office, state-prison spending has increased by 48 percent, including a 9 percent increase for fiscal 1995-96. The RAND corporation estimates the law’s price tag for California taxpayers will eventually reach $5.5 billion per year. Meanwhile, overflowing prisons have forced the premature release of countless inmates: In Los Angeles, the county jail lets 4,200 inmates out early each month, partly to accommodate petty thieves, facing life in prison, who now demand jury trials.

Pete Wilson…has also held the line on out-of-control state spending, reducing the state’s general fund budget by $1.6 billion from his first year in office.

Wilson’s opponents love to remind him that in 1991 he authorized a $7.5 billion tax hike, the biggest state tax increase in U.S. history. His attempts to deflate the ballooning budget deficit since then may end up costing the state even more. Wilson and the state legislature “closed” the state’s budget gap through a series of disingenuous deals, such as raiding property taxes from local governments, deferring government employee benefits, classifying education spending as a “loan” to public schools, and dipping into cigarette tax revenue earmarked for anti-smoking education. Five such devices have been declared illegal, which could force the state to repay as much as $3 billion, not to mention hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees.

A national leader for immigration reform, Gov. Wilson led the charge to enact Proposition 187, an initiative to end taxpayer-supported services for those who enter the country illegally.

Wilson has a habit of luring immigrants to California, then turning his back on them once they arrive. In the mid-’80s, Wilson supported a supplement to the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act that offered legal residency to immigrants who could prove, after arriving in the country, that they were agricultural workers. As recently as 1993, Wilson rejected a series of reforms, including a Proposition 187-like proposal to deny taxpayer funds to illegal immigrants.

Last year, he jumped on the anti-immigrant band-wagon with Proposition 187. Yet the proposition does nothing to prevent workers from entering the country illegally (Pete’s agribusiness backers are dependent on the labor of illegals), it just punishes them once they’re here. In late July, a federal judge strongly hinted she may soon summarily declare the law uncostitutional.

Pete Wilson hasn’t just talked about ending welfare as we know it. In California, he has dramatically reduced welfare grants by putting people back on the road to self-reliance.

Wilson has slashed Aid to Families with Dependent Children by 25 percent over the last four years. As a result, the number of California children living in poverty has grown by 400,000 since 1991.

In this year’s budget, he cut funds for the poor, elederly, blind, and disabled in the state’s 41 poorest counties by 10 percent. Even his much-advertised workfare program, GAIN, lost $40 million of its original designated funding. Meanwhile, Wilson pushed an across-the-board 15 percent corporate and income tax cut, only to have it killed by the state Senate.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate