Newt Exposed: See For Yourself

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The Federal Election Commission recently released over a thousand documents relating to its case against GOPAC in federal court. While newspapers and other print media can only print short quotes from these sources, the MoJo Wire lets you see the documents themselves. The following is the first in a series annotating documents from the FEC and other sources. (Click on the documents for full-size copies.)

Correspondence between Gingrich and Kansas City developer Miller Nichols, director of the J.C. Nichols Company:

In a January 19, 1990 letter to Gingrich, Nichols writes: “I list below my record of giving [to GOPAC] since 1985. My total support including the attached check for $10,000 equals $59,000. . . The federal government is causing the J.C. Nichols Company. . . a great deal of financial distress. This is in connection with the asbestos regulations. . . It may be that I will call you for an appointment to come back to Washington to discuss this issue.”


 

In his response to Nichols, Newt promises to look into the “problematic” regulations.


 

On April 24, Newt writes to William Reilly, then-administrator of the EPA, expressing his concern over “the crisis that is arising in our courts from asbestos litigation” and soliciting any “help” Reilly could give. A handwritten postscript at the bottom of the letter reads: “Is there any reasonable way to reapproach this issue or is it just hopelessly entangled?” The letter is cc’d to Miller Nichols.

Miller Nichols’ support of GOPAC has continued strong since the above exchange. Earlier this year our Following Newt’s Money feature revealed that Nichols and his wife Jeanette have donated more than $90,000 to GOPAC through 1994.

Keep an eye on this spot. We will have more annotated documents up in the coming days and weeks.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate