Capital Gains

If we fully value natural resources, capitalism will have a better chance to live long and prosper.

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


Natural capital is easy to overlook because it is the pond we swim in. One can live perfectly well without ever giving a thought to the sulfur cycle or wetland functions. Only when the benefits nature provides are disrupted do we take notice. When rain disappears and soil blows away in the Southwest, when reservoirs become polluted, or when we learn that mercury contaminates the fish we eat from the Great Lakes, we suddenly grasp the effect of natural capital depletion. Most floods are caused by man, not weather; deforestation, levee construction, erosion, and overgrazing all result in the loss of ecosystem services.

Compared to the rest of the world, Americans are fortunate — so far. Many regions face far more severe effects of natural capital depletion. But each ecosystem depends on the health of all ecosystems. The atmosphere does not fathom whether CO2 comes from U.S. oil or Chinese coal, nor do hurricanes lose force because the Heritage Foundation doesn’t believe global warming is a problem. Living systems operate on laws over which we have no say.

Economists insist that natural and manufactured capital are substitutable — that we can invent technological adaptations to compensate for the loss of living systems. In some cases, as with copper, wood, and coal, the search for substitutes has indeed proved economically and technologically beneficial. Nevertheless, some forms of natural capital are simply irreplaceable.

Try to imagine the technologies that could replace the services nature provides, including these noted by Dutch scientist Rudolf S. de Groot: oxygen production; purification of water and air; regulation of atmospheric chemistry; protection against cosmic and ultraviolet radiation; solar energy; regulation of local and global climate; maintenance of biological and genetic diversity; maintenance of wildlife migration and habitats; storage, detoxification, and recycling of human waste; natural pest and disease control; genetic and medicinal resource production; prevention of soil erosion; sediment control; regulation of runoff and flood prevention; regulation of the chemical composition of oceans; formation of topsoil and maintenance of soil fertility; production of fertilizers and food; nutrient storage and recycling; and fuel and energy production.

If there are no technological substitutes for these services, how will we replace their vital benefits? At what point will we decide that maintaining our remaining natural capital makes more sense than counting on a technology yet to be invented? For business, this is the critical issue: Given that natural capital services amount to subsidies worth trillions of dollars to industry, and that these subsidies are running out, how will business be able to prosper in the future?

We need to revise our economic thinking to give full value to our natural resources. This revised economics will stabilize both the theory and the practice of free-market capitalism. It will provide business and public policy with a powerful new tool for economic development, profitability, and the promotion of the public good.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate