Footing the Bill

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Footing the Bill

One small step for reform, one giant gift for the Democrats.

by Omar Beer

#2 Arnold S. Hiatt, 69, Weston, Mass. Party: D. $511,500 total contributions

View Hiatt’s itemized contributions.

Arnold Hiatt When he made the largest single political donation during the last election cycle, Arnold Hiatt explained his $500,000 gift to the Democratic National Committee in oxymoronic terms. “I think the kind of contribution I made should be outlawed,” he said, “and that’s why I did it.” Disingenuous as that may have sounded, Hiatt argued that Democrats were most likely to implement campaign finance reform, and that his humongous contribution would help elect people who would stop people like him from giving such humongous contributions.

Hiatt does lay claim to a history of corporate do-gooding, first during his tenure as president of Stride Rite, the maker of Keds and Sperry shoes, and now through his socially conscious work via its related foundation. The company is widely credited with having pioneered on-site daycare — though lately the shoe manufacturer has had a more checkered history, opting to close, rather than renovate, plants in New England.

Like Stride Rite’s corporate profile, Hiatt’s donation is tough to judge. It seems counterintuitive to flood campaign coffers in order to dry them out. But the DNC can’t claim even the pretense of such lofty ideals. Indeed, the party failed to report Hiatt’s gift at first, later calling the omission “inadvertent.”

Which could help Hiatt’s cause after all. Publicity surrounding such disturbing miscounts might just fuel a reform drive, even if Hiatt’s reform-minded Democrats drag their feet.

Photo credit: Brian Smith

Next Profile | MoJo 400 Central

 

The 400 List:

Browse
The full Mother Jones 400 list.

Profiles
Meet the people with political pull.

 

Searches:

Individuals
Search the top 400 political donors by name, industry, state, or contribution amount.

Itemized Contributions
The details of every donation, searchable by donor, recipient, date, amount, and more.

 

Discuss:

Money & Politics
Is campaign finance reform the way to a better government?

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate