Prepared for Takeoff

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Prepared for Takeoff

A big-time donor wants to pilot his own craft.

by Jeff Shear

#256 Alfred Checchi, 48, Beverly Hills, Calif. Party: Both. $112,000 total contributions.

View Checchi’s itemized contributions.

Alfred Checchi has wanted to graduate from donor to player for a long time. Last January, the co-chairman of Northwest Airlines and longtime Democratic fundraiser finally figured out how, plunking down $3 million in an opening bid to become California’s next governor. With a personal fortune estimated at $550 million, Checchi will be a major player between now and the June 1998 Democratic primary.

Checchi, whose trademarks are fitness (he’s run the New York City Marathon), family (he has three children), and hair transplants (he’s had two), became seriously involved in Democratic politics in the mid-1980s when he was working in Los Angeles as a financial strategist for the billionaire Bass brothers. While volunteering for Democrat Alan Cranston’s 1986 Senate campaign, Checchi sought the advice of former Rep. Tony L. Coelho, a California Democrat, about a candidacy of his own. “I told Al to get more gray hair,” says Coelho. “He was too young.”

Checchi’s role as a political fundraiser did, however, give him some clout in Washington. Rep. James L. Oberstar (D-Minn.), who has received $18,750 from Northwest’s PAC since 1989, has, over the years, reportedly used his subcommittee chair to help out Checchi’s business interests. More recently, Northwest has led the charge against a federal tax on airline tickets, arguing instead for airport “user fees” — i.e., payments for each landing and takeoff — which would favor large airlines at the expense of lower-cost, short-haul carriers.

If Checchi continues with his gubernatorial bid, he could be on a collision course with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who is also eyeing the governorship. Until now, Checchi and his wife, Kathryn, have been generous Feinstein supporters. Moreover, Feinstein’s husband, San Francisco financier Richard C. Blum, helped with Checchi’s Northwest takeover and sits on the company’s board.

There is some speculation that Checchi is merely acting as a placeholder for Feinstein: His money ties up her opponents, and, in return, Feinstein appoints Checchi to fill out the remainder of her Senate term. Feinstein media consultant Bill Carrick pooh-poohs this notion, however. “She was surprised that this guy announced out of the blue that he was considering a run for governor,” he says.

If that is the case, Feinstein could be in trouble. Checchi told a group of Santa Clara County business leaders he’s willing to spend $30 million for a ticket to Sacramento, and political consultant Joe Cerrell says Checchi’s budget could be as large as $42 million.

Ironically, California’s own campaign reform initiative, designed to declaw fat-cat donors, works to Checchi’s advantage: Potential candidates without the war chests of incumbency (such as former White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta) are largely cut out unless they have a personal fortune.

Garry South, chief of staff for Lt. Gov. Gray Davis, another gubernatorial hopeful, dismisses Checchi’s chances, calling him “Al Checkbook.” South says, “[Big donors] get the sense that because they are courted by politicians, that by a process of osmosis, they are real political players.”

MoJo 400 Central

 

The 400 List:

Browse
The full Mother Jones 400 list.

Profiles
Meet the people with political pull.

 

Searches:

Individuals
Search the top 400 political donors by name, industry, state, or contribution amount.

Itemized Contributions
The details of every donation, searchable by donor, recipient, date, amount, and more.

 

Discuss:

Money & Politics
Is campaign finance reform the way to a better government?

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate