Deconstructing Tobacco

The RJR documents on Camels and kids—a MoJo Wire <A HREF="/news_wire/tobacco_doc1.html">annotation</A>.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


It’s not often evidence emerges that shows a corporation contemplating a life of crime as part of its overall marketing strategy. Then again, only few companies make a product that, as the old joke goes, kills you when used as directed.

As part of the settlement of a lawsuit brought against R.J. Reynolds by more than a dozen California cities and counties for targeting children with its marketing campaigns, the cigarette-maker recently released thousands of pages of confidential marketing documents, many of which reveal how the company hoped to “youthen [its] brand” by targeting “the 14 to 24 age group.”

RJR denies the documents were ever meant to be implemented as part of a marketing strategy. Perhaps. But it is interesting to note that the documents below—with all their “cool attitudes” references—were written in 1986, two years before the introduction of our favorite, recently departed phallic symbol, Joe Camel.

Marketing to children is one thing, but there’s something else going on here—an abstract academese that conspires with smoke-blowing adspeak to produce a work of such euphemistic repetition that we can’t help but wonder if perhaps a new addition to the Surgeon General’s disclaimer repertoire is in order: WARNING: Selling cigarettes may cause brain damage, and may complicate candor, decency, and the ability to communicate without using phrases like “full/authentic smoking satisfaction.”

For your full reading satisfaction, we’ve annotated one of the latest “smoking gun” documents. Just move your mouse over the highlighted areas—and enjoy.

Start here.

G. Beato is a regular contributor to Suck and Mother Jones.

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate