Jury Sees Starr Docs, Finds GM Liable for Death

“At what point does a lawyer’s manipulation of the system become an obstruction of the truth?” — Kenneth Starr, June 1, 1998

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


In February and March the MoJo Wire reported how Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr in a 1993 lawsuit avidly suppressed key General Motors internal documents which reveal the apparent perjury of a GM engineer concerning GM’s vulnerable fuel tank design. Two weeks ago a Florida jury, the first to see those crucial documents, delivered a $33 million judgment against the corporation for a fuel-tank fire that killed two people.

The Broward County jury awarded Robert and Constance McGee a total of $60 million in damages for the death of their 13-year-old son Shane McGee, who died along with cousin Nancy Hawthorne when the fuel tank in the family’s 1983 Oldsmobile Cutlass station wagon exploded in a 1991 accident. Jurors found GM to be 55 percent liable for the boy’s death due to its fuel tank design.

The other driver in the accident was deemed 45 percent responsible because his trailer came loose from his truck and slammed into the McGee vehicle, puncturing the fuel tank and sparking the fatal fire.

The GM documents, including the 1981 interview with GM engineer Edward Ivey which Starr suppressed, were released this year by the judge in the Florida case, GM’s longest liability case ever.

Ivey has testified under oath in numerous trials that he could not remember why he did a 1973 cost-benefit analysis of fire deaths in GM vehicles, in which he valued a human life at $200,000. But in the suppressed interview, Ivey told GM lawyers he did it for Oldsmobile management to help them weigh the cost of fire-death litigation and “figure out how much Olds could spend on fuel systems.” Other GM documents show the company studied the cost of fixing its vulnerable tanks, but chose not to fix them until 1988.

In a statement issued by GM after the verdict on May 18, the company said the jury was “obscured in their analysis by improper evidentiary rulings throughout the trial.” According to GM spokesman Kyle Johnson, the judge’s “improper” rulings were those that allowed the damaging Ivey documents into evidence.

The company vowed to appeal the decision. If successful, it would be at least the third time that GM counsel have overturned a judge who ruled the Ivey documents into evidence. Twice it was done by Starr himself.

Joe McCray, a San Francisco attorney who has battled GM in more than 25 cases, said the $33 million judgment is “pocket change” for GM but that the verdict may hurt GM’s prospects in subsequent trials. “I fully intend to make it a problem for them in the future,” said McCray. “These verdicts do not come along everyday. It is difficult to hold [large corporations] accountable; hopefully they will take more care in designing their fuel tanks.”

Starr’s lead role in suppressing the Ivey documents led one trial attorney to lodge a formal obstruction of justice charge against him in March with the Department of Justice. The charge is still sitting on Attorney General Janet Reno’s desk; a spokesperson said the Department of Justice is deferring action on it until the judge in the Monica Lewinsky case rules on other charges against Starr filed by President Clinton’s attorney David Kendall.

Ironically, Kenneth Starr made a speech Monday to a county bar association in Charlotte, N.C., cautioning the attorneys not to abuse the legal system to obstruct truth and justice. Defense lawyers, Starr intoned, “have a duty not to use their skills to impede the search for truth.”

“At what point,” Starr asked rhetorically, “does a lawyer’s manipulation of the system become an obstruction of the truth?”

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate