Testing the Waters (continued)

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


next

The Navy says it plans to use binoculars and hydrophones to watch and listen for whales that are too close. “They can’t do that,” says Weilgart. “It’s bogus.” That’s because whales are only near the surface a fraction of the time, she says, and they often stop singing as soon as they hear a noise, such as that of a boat. In anticipation of such criticism, the Navy is now scrambling to develop a high-frequency sonar “fish finder” to improve detection. Even with this new technology, Fristrup says they can guarantee only a 70-percent detection rate.

But even a 100-percent success rate may not satisfy LFAS opponents. According to Roger Gentry of the National Marine Fisheries Service, who has reviewed the draft EIS, the one-kilometer cushion is based on the assumption that anything up to 180 decibels is safe enough for animals at that distance. Although scientists differ on how to translate underwater sounds into their above-water equivalents, 180 decibels is comparable to what you’d hear at a Metallica concert.

What is certain is that, because sound as measured in decibels increases logarithmically, 180 decibels is 400 times louder than 155 decibels — the maximum intensity to which whales were exposed during the EIS testing. Fristrup, Tyack, and Clark said they would be reluctant or unwilling to participate in a test involving exposing animals to a 180-decibel sound level. Although there is no definitive data on whales, based on what scientists know about other mammals, 180 decibels is about the level at which, depending on the conditions again, some species will suffer temporary hearing loss.

Nevertheless, the Navy appears determined to go forward. “The public doesn’t have to approve this document,” says EIS Program Director Joe Johnson. You will, however, have 30 to 60 days to comment after the draft EIS is released. After the public comment period is over, the Navy will produce a final version of the EIS. Although the NRDC will attempt to force the Navy to apply to the National Marine Fisheries Service for permission to deploy LFAS, the Navy claims deployment only requires approval from, you guessed it, the Navy.

next

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate