Communism for Profiteers

Several hundred titans of American business are off to China to ponder that country’s massive market potential, and to celebrate 50 years of communism.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


As Congress argues about alleged tranfer of sensitive military secrets and technology to China, and while officials in Beijing step up their campaign against dissidents, Fortune magazine is arranging for several hundred corporate executives to travel to Shanghai this fall, just in time to celebrate half a century of Chinese communism. The execs will be attending the invitation-only 1999 Fortune Global Forum — participation is limited to “chairmen, presidents, and CEOs of major multinational companies” — which will focus on “the practical realities of doing business in China today and into the next century.”

Entitled “China: The Next Fifty Years,” three-day event will open on Sept. 27 and conclude just prior to the official celebration on Oct. 1 marking the 50th anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic. Along with corporate honchos from Sweden, Germany, Finland, Brazil, Japan, India, and England, there will be American execs from companies such as Dell Computer Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Electric Co., and Honeywell Inc. Chinese business and government leaders will be on hand as well, thereby giving Global Forum participants the opportunity to, as the event’s promotional materials put it “network with good people.”

According to Fortune, some of the corporate chieftains will travel on to Beijing “for anniversary commemorations” of 50 years of communism and watch the Chinese military parade at Tiananmen Square as part of the festivities. Fortune is careful to point out, however, that the executives who do choose to go on to Beijing will be attending the fête on their own, and not as part of the conference.

One astonished China watcher on Capitol Hill, who asked not to be named, thought it more than ironic that the titans of capitalism are traveling to China to celebrate the achievements of communism. “What does it imply for the future of democracy in China? If you are struggling to bring democracy to China, you have to fight not only the secret police, but now Western business interests and the Western media as well.”

The Chinese government is rolling out the red carpet for the CEOs. They’ll be officially welcomed by President Jiang Zemin, who is scheduled to travel to Shanghai to deliver the keynote address at the opening night dinner. Jiang has also “inscribed a greeting in calligraphy, sending his personal best wishes for the Forum’s success,” according to the conference’s Web site.

Of course, no China affair would be complete without former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, the man who downplayed the massacre at Tiananmen Square and who now consults for companies doing business in China. He’s slated to be the main attraction at the luncheon on the Global Forum’s second day.

Other retired government officials set to journey to Shanghai include former United States Trade Representative Carla Hills and former Commerce Secretary Mickey Kantor, who is scheduled to deliver a speech entitled “What Now for China?” Fortune has also lined up a lecture by Lee Kuan Yew, who was the notoriously law-and-order-obsessed prime minister of Singapore for 37 years and who now serves as a senior minister in that country.

The conference is being organized by Fortune’s business side — the head of the magazine’s conference division, John Needham, has temporarily moved to Shanghai to oversee planning for the gala affair — but a number of editors and journalists are attending, including some senior Fortune editors who will be moderating panel discussions. These include Norman Pearlstine, editor-in-chief of Fortune and Time magazines as well as other Time Inc. publications, and John Huey, Fortune managing editor. In a Global Forum brochure, Huey describes the affair as “the most important international event in our magazine’s 69-year history.”

next

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate