Abortion at Sea

A Dutch doctor aims to launch a floating clinic to help women end unwanted pregnancies offshore, out of reach of their countries’ laws.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Women around the world who can’t get abortions in their native lands may soon have a chance to get them at sea.

Dr. Rebecca Gomperts, a physician in the Netherlands, is currently working to raise a million dollars to equip a ship, to be dubbed Sea Change, as an ocean-borne abortion clinic. Gomperts aims to sail around the world, picking up women with unwanted pregnancies in countries that ban abortions and taking them 12 miles offshore into international waters to perform the procedure. On shore, she and her half-dozen crew members will also train local abortion providers, give out contraceptives, and hold workshops on reproductive health issues.

The World Health Organization estimates that 20 million of 53 million abortions each year are performed under unsafe and illegal conditions and result in the deaths of some 70,000 women. By offering safe, legal abortion services, Gomperts aims to help offset those numbers to some small degree — and to help inspire women’s groups, legislators, and public health workers to agitate for easier access to abortion.

“The main idea is to reduce mortalities caused by unsafe abortions,” says Gomperts.

The idea for Sea Change was born while Gomperts served as a physician on Greenpeace’s ship, the Rainbow Warrior. Greenpeace’s ability to change public policy through direct actions convinced her that similar strategies could be used to improve reproductive rights on a country-by-country basis.

But will her floating clinic plan hold water? Predictably, the ship has triggered a flood of controversy before it has even launched. When word recently leaked out that Sea Change will make the heavily-Catholic island state of Malta one of its stops, local officials were outraged. Leading bishops called the plan a “monstrosity”; deputy prime minister Lawrence Gonzi called it “horrendous” and has threatened to prosecute anyone cooperating with Gomperts.

In Europe, Ireland and Poland also ban abortions. But Gomperts says the need for her services is most acute in South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia. No matter where she plans to go, however, pro-life activists hope Gomperts’ plan dies in the water.

The idea “isn’t just wrong; it’s stupid,” says Father Richard Welch, president of US-based Human Life International. “To perform this procedure on a ship, with the difficulties in maintaining a proper surgical environment, without proper follow-up care, while making these women endure a 25-mile ferry ride on the open ocean, is unconscionably bad treatment of women.”

Gomperts insists the women will not be in any danger. She will only perform first-trimester abortions, she says, which she calls “very simple” procedures. “Under local anesthesia, it won’t take more than five to 10 minutes,” says Gomperts. “It will be very safe, and if there are any complications, I’m sure we can treat them on board.”

Anika Rahman, director of international programs at the Center for Reproductive Law and Policy, is concerned about how local women’s groups will respond to a foreign entity providing abortion services.

“The local groups may feel like somebody is stepping on their toes,” she says.

There’s also concern that women who receive abortions on board Sea Change may be prosecuted upon returning to their home country — as the Maltese deputy prime minister has threatened.

Whether international waters are considered outside domestic abortion laws varies from country to country, says University of Richmond law professor John Paul Jones, an expert in comparative constitutional law.

Gomperts says that she’ll only go where she’s invited. “We’ve had a lot of positive responses — otherwise, we wouldn’t be doing this,” she says. “We have already identified some countries where the groups are really, really interested in working with us. And those are the countries we go to, not anywhere else.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate