Missouri’s Mixed Messages

Missouri voters chose to ban gay marriage; but they also gave Democrats a strong candidate for governor.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“Show-Me State” voters showed up in record numbers for Missouri’s primary election Tuesday, and they made history. With polls indicating a close election there in November, the day’s results brought a mix of good and bad news for both Republicans and Democrats.

Missouri became the first state to pass a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage since the Massachusetts Supreme Court ruled to allow the practice. The state also became the first in 10 years to oust a sitting governor in his party’s primary.

While the gay marriage ban was expected to pass, it did so by a surprisingly large margin, and turnout was the highest since the state began keeping primary records in 1980. About 71 percent of Missouri voters supported the measure despite the presence of an anti-gay marriage law already on the books. As the Kansas City Star reports, the amendment also passed despite its opponents outspending supporters by a large margin. (They mounted a $300,000 campaign.) The amendment did well across the state, with more than 80 percent support in rural areas, a majority in most suburbs, and a narrow majority in Kansas City.

Even in the Democratic stronghold of St. Louis, the amendment gained more than 46 percent of the vote. Perhaps most disheartening for gay-rights activists, more than 846,000 Democrats voted Tuesday, compared to about 604,000 Republicans. Given the margin of victory, a large number of Democrats clearly voted for the amendment.

Gay-marriage supporters have little time to mourn the loss, as seven other states in the next three months will vote on changing their state constitutions to outlaw gay marriage – and Nevada, Hawaii, Alaska and Nebraska have already passed such amendments. When the federal attempt at an amendment failed last month, many opponents argued that gay marriage should be left to the states to decide. Groups like Human Rights Campaign, which spent $60,000 trying to stop the Missouri amendment, are finding little success in that approach. As HRC coordinator Seth Kilbourn said:

“I think we’ll definitely have an uphill battle. But I do think we’ll have more time in other states to educate voters and talk about what the amendments are really about.”

For the Kerry campaign, the overwhelming support for the amendment can’t help. Both John Kerry and John Edwards oppose gay marriage, but also opposed amending the constitution in response. With Missouri voters willing to take such a drastic step, George Bush might be able to use gay marriage as a wedge issue in a state that narrowly supported him in 2000.

Kerry got better news in the Missouri gubernatorial race, where state auditor Claire McCaskill defeated Gov. Bob Holden in the Democratic primary. Holden – who Republicans nicknamed “One-Term Bob” – battled a budget crisis nearly from the start of his term, cut millions of dollars from popular programs to balance said budget, and oversaw the Republican takeover of the Senate for the first time in decades. Lawmakers overrode three of Holden’s vetoes last year alone – the same number of overrides the state had previously seen since the Civil War.

“He’s a victim of circumstance,” said St. Louis University political science professor Kenneth Warren. “He is like so many governors in the United States who went through hard times amid a budgetary collapse. The Republicans in Missouri went after this guy in the most aggressive way imaginable. They sort of beat him to a pulp.”

Democrats reportedly saw electability as a key reason for McCaskill’s victory in an expensive and bitter primary against the embattled Holden. Polls already give her a narrow edge against Republican Matt Blunt, the current secretary of state and the son of Rep. Roy Blunt. Holden has already met with McCaskill and called for party unity. As political scientist Dave Robertson told the Associated Press:

“As bitter as this Democratic primary has been, it is not as bitter as the 1992 Republican primary for governor. The Democrats are really hungry to win this fall, and that should give them incentive to find unity.”

McCaskill has already fielded congratulatory calls from the likes of Terry McAuliffe, Tom Vilsack and Kathleen Sebelius. And John Kerry was quick to praise McCaskill, who Democrats hope can boost the national ticket in Missouri:

“Claire is a strong leader who will rally women, men, Democrats, Republicans and the hundreds of thousands of independent voters in the Show Me State. Together, Claire and I are going to win in Missouri come November.”

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate