Editor’s Note: December 2005

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Any editorial staff putting together an issue on religion and government must grapple with two fundamental questions: what is government, and what is religion? The first question is easy to answer; the second is impossible. Especially in a nation that prays to both the Church of Rome and the Church of Elvis, that flocks to both Billy Graham and L. Ron Hubbard, religion is perhaps best defined by Potter Stewart’s test for pornography: you know it when you see it.

This October Thursday morning, as I consider the varieties of American religious experience, two strong images come to mind. The first is of the chapel of First Missionary Baptist Church in Fernandina Beach, Florida. First Missionary is a world away from other churches I’ve attended. Unlike First Presbyterian Church of Verona, New Jersey, into whose purple-and-white-robed propriety I was confirmed, and unlike First Baptist Church of Molena, Georgia, whose country pastor had a disconcerting knack of discerning from the pulpit the transgressions of my adolescent heart, First Missionary is a clapping church. Its services are rousing, its pastor—during the years when I was there the pastor was Andrew McRae—charismatic, and its call and response so fervent that ultimately it was impossible to divine who, minister or congregation, was doing the calling, and who the responding.

A good McRae sermon was more akin to avalanche than homily. He liked to launch each one slow and pretty, but by the time you saw it coming it was tumbling and roaring too fast to outrun. At some point, usually while things were still relatively calm, McRae’s exertions would be met by a barely audible, spontaneous humming from the pews. The humming would coalesce into a hymn, sung low at first and then louder, with the organist throwing in an occasional mischievous chord, until by the time McRae reached his peroration he had to shout above a full-throat chorus, the exhortings, advice, encouragement, and correction of his insurrectionary congregation.

I would wish for my country that it could perfect such a relationship between governor and governed, shepherd and flock, could learn to luxuriate in such a fractious democracy—what my friend MaVynee called the consent of the rebellious.

That’s the second thing I think of, my friend MaVynee. MaVynee Betsch was nothing if not rebellious. Child of the black haute bourgeoisie of Jacksonville, Florida, great-granddaughter of A. L. Lewis—Florida’s first black millionaire and cofounder of Florida’s first insurance company and also of American Beach, a black Depression-era seaside resort that still exists in threadbare splendor—she threw all her pedigree and privilege overboard, deserted her celebrated career as an opera singer in Europe in the 1950s and ’60s, gave away her inheritance to the last penny to environmental causes, grew her hair to her heels, and lobbied hard and successfully to preserve local black history and to protect the great sand dune at the core of American Beach, where she lived as a willful pauper, sometimes residing on a chaise longue on the beach in front of A. L. Lewis’ old home.

It’s odd that I should think of MaVynee when I try to define religion, because among her other rebellions, she rejected organized faiths. She saw the concept of “god” as a patriarchal confection, and the church as an engine of conformity and social regimentation. She might have seen it otherwise—might have made common bond with an institution that has historically been a hotbed of protest, especially in lands like ours not dominated by a mother denomination. Most of

America’s churches, regardless of affiliation, could fairly call themselves “protestant,” because burning in their hearts is a red coal of outrage, at racial injustice, or abortion, or declining social mores, or promiscuous hedonism, or war. Religion is not only the opiate of the masses; it’s the methamphetamine.

American churches are to a large degree defined by what they choose to rebel against. The Christian right has set itself in opposition to liberal, secular government and, as a political consequence, declared itself a buddy of big business. The alliance of those two makes historic sense: sects since the Puritans have positioned themselves in relation to capitalism, and couched virtue and sin in commercial terms. And it makes psycholog-ical sense: churches that see themselves as bulwarks against the evils of the flesh find colder, sexless endeavors like business and sports more congenial than the suspect domains of sensuality and art.

The conundrum is: the alliance between religion and business makes no religious sense. What will happen on the day American Christians wake up to realize that capitalism is economic Darwinism, that free enterprise is code for individualistic amorality, that the marketplace is the temple of secular humanism? Will they then shift their allegiance to support a more liberal ideal of communal responsibility, and perhaps even become fans of government? The prospect of that shift in religious awareness is one of the great reservoirs of latent energy in the nation’s political landscape. Unleashed, it would reshape religion as well as politics, in a direction MaVynee would have applauded.

Though MaVynee rejected the church, it was only to adopt a more rigorous, more scouring penitence. Her professed godlessness was accompanied by the rituals of deep devotion: monasticism, constant prayer, divestiture of riches, a renunciation of worldliness. In the eyes of at least this ordinary believer, she was, until her death last month at 70, the embodiment and exemplification of a religious approach to life.

I would wish for my country that it could learn to honor such maverick observance as truest faith, could feel jealous of any place where an atheist has the abundant freedom to lead her friend to grace. On Saturday, when a Yoruba priestess spreads MaVynee’s ashes over the sand dune she rescued in the town her great-grandfather built, I will rejoice in living in just such a place, and in having such a friend, God rest her soul.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate