A Big Day Calls for a Big Lie

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


Yesterday, in an attempt to rally the conservative base before the midterms, Bush’s press secretary Tony Snow had a sitdown with Rush Limbaugh. Snow urged listeners to take the media’s portrayal of gloom and doom in Iraq with a grain of salt, saying: “The war is more popular in Iraq than it is in the United States because the Iraqis actually get to see the Americans in action.”

Now, no one expects Limbaugh to keep a close tally of the facts, but sitting in a recording studio shouldn’t give his guests, especially those from the White House, carte blanche to mangle the truth. Considering that Iraq couldn’t be much less popular stateside (“most polls show that only a third of Americans approve of the President’s handling of the situation), Snow’s remark is akin to Bush pointing at Robert Mugabe and saying, “hey my approval ratings are higher than that guy’s.”

Even using a low threshold of popularity as a basis for comparison, sentiment in Iraq towards U.S. forces hardly seems convivial. To put it in perspective, a recent poll done by Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes, found that six in ten Iraqis approve of attacks on U.S.-led forces. Moreover, it found that 78 percent of Iraqis think “the U.S. presence provokes more violence than it prevents.” These findings are confirmed by the State Department’s own poll that found two-thirds of Iraqis in Baghdad favor an immediate withdrawal of U.S. troops. The dismal situation in Iraq can be described as many things, but “popular” probably isn’t one of them. In any case, it’s safe to say that the White House’s version of truth always comes with a not-so-small margin of error.

—Koshlan Mayer-Blackwell

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate