Appeals Court Set to Hear “Wardrobe Malfunction” Case

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


Wardrobe Malfunction
Hey, did anyone hear about this thing? I don’t remember it getting much coverage. Back in 2004, I guess one of Michael Jackson’s sisters and a Mouseketeer were at the World Series and did a whole song and dance routine where their clothes exploded? It sounds awesome. Honestly, why doesn’t the media report on this stuff? It’s all “blah blah, indepth reporting on the war and our government’s lies.” Yawn. Well, apparently this “wardrobe malfunction” is still working its way through our nation’s court system: today, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia will hear the case of the exposed bazonga.

The FCC originally fined CBS $550,000 for the incident, which, if upheld, would be the largest fine ever against a television broadcaster. CBS appealed, saying that they “did not plan the sole part of the performance the FCC says made it indecent, the ‘costume reveal’.” Right. It seemed like an, er, open-and-shut case, but these days, the FCC’s indecency standards are coming under increasing attack, reports Reuters: two courts in New York have rejected the government’s policies on indecent speech, specifically, “fleeting expletives.” Now there’s a good name for a band.

While the issues work through the courts, the FCC has sat on its hands, or maybe everybody’s just watching their mouths: there have been no proposals of fines since March of 2006. You’re telling me we could have been ripping each other’s clothes off on TV for the last 18 months? Fleeting expletive!

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate