Grammy Nominees: The Right-On and the Random

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


mojo-photo-grammysart.jpgBy now everyone’s seen the big news about the Grammy nods: Kanye gets a bunch, Amy Winehouse gets almost as many, and Bruce gets denied in the Album of the Year category. Since the Grammy nominees have about as much to do with good music as, I dunno, the contestants on America’s Next Top Model have to do with human beauty, it doesn’t really pay to fret about who’s been unjustly denied a nomination. What’s more interesting is finding evidence there are some serious weed smokers in the nominating committees, allowing both compelling and completely baffling nods to slip through.

First up, Best Short Form Video may be the strangest combination of artists in the whole list, with the late Johnny Cash competing with iPod shiller Feist, French disco-dancers Justice, pop-soul duo Gnarls Barkley, and pop-rock combo Mute Math. Remember that Mute Math video, “Typical,” I put it in a “Neato Viddys” a few months back. It’s backwards and nutty!

Best Remix (Non-Classical) is always an amusing category, at least if you try to imagine stodgy old Grammy voters putting a 12″ on the turntable and dancing around the sitting room. Italian dance producer Benny Benassi gets a nod for his dull Public Enemy remix, as does Eric Prydz for his slightly more tolerable take on Pink Floyd (both of these featuring artists Grammy voters might recognize). However, Carl Craig’s remix of Junior Boys’ “Like a Child” is a bit of a surprise here. I found a homemade video of doofy snapshots on YouTube that features the whole song, so you can give it a listen:

Its oddly atonal take on the original doesn’t even get a bass drum until late in the 4th minute; were Grammy voters just reading Pitchfork for ideas?

Best Surround Sound Album is also a pretty funny category: talk about an opportunity to get out the weed and head into your 73-speaker listening room. Along with a few symphonies and The Beatles, Oklahoman art-instigators The Flaming Lips have landed in this category with the surround-sound mix of At War With the Mystics, their 2006 album that featured “The W.A.N.D.,” a Dungen-like piece inspiring riff-tastic psychedelia. You can’t get the full surround-sound experience on YouTube, but it’s still fun to watch:

Otherwise, even most of the nominations I’m kind of pleased by are “repeat” nods for previously-nominated artists (see the Chems for Best Dance Recording, Beck for Solo Rock Vocal), a syndrome which has its penultimate expression in the Album of the Year entry for Herbie Hancock, whose entire audience now appears to be Grammy voters. Even the Best Alternative Music Album, typically a bastion of credibility, is kind of underwhelming: Bjork’s Volta doesn’t deserve to be there at all, and everybody likes Lily Allen, but a Grammy?

Finally, it’s bittersweet to see UGK in the Rap Duo or Group category, just days after the untimely death of member Pimp C. Let’s check out the video for “International Player’s Anthem” again, it’s so great.

The winners are announced on February 10th, 2008.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate