Obama to Clinton: You Can’t Catch Me

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


David Plouffe, Barack Obama’s campaign manager, was not gloating the morning after. But he did have a message for Hillary Clinton’s camp: you can’t catch us.

That is, in delegates awarded via primaries and caucuses.

Speaking to reporters on a conference call on Wednesday morning–after Barack Obama swept Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia by supersized margins–Plouffe was low-key in manner but confident in substance. He maintained that, by his campaign’s number, Obama now had a lead of 136 delegates in the race for pledged delegates (that excludes superdelegates). He termed it an “enormous” advantage and noted that Clinton could not close this gap without running up a string of “blowout” wins in the coming primaries, including big states (such as delegate-rich Ohio, Texas, and Pennsylvania) and other states. “Even the most creative math does not get her back to even in pledged delegates,” he insisted.

Spin from a front-runner? Plouffe’s math seemed more right than wrong. Under the Democratic Party rules, delegates are awarded proportionally. If Obama’s streak comes to an end and he places a close second to Clinton in most of the upcoming contests, she will not net a great many delegates. Clinton will have to beat Obama by large margins in Ohio, Texas and elsewhere to catch up. Plouffe claimed that the Obama campaign has already created a “buffer” in the race for pledged delegates, asserting that “it is unlikely it will be eroded….The math is the math.”

The numbers are certainly clear on one point: neither candidate is likely to win enough pledged delegates to reach the magic number needed to snag the nomination. So if Plouffe is correct, the issue becomes, what will the nearly 800 superdelegates do? Could Clinton orchestrate a come-from-behind victory by coaxing a majority of them to back her? Asked about this possibility, Plouffe replied, “We believe the pledged delegate leader will be the nominee.” He said not much else on the subject.

“We couldn’t be in a stronger position,” Plouffe remarked. That’s not much of an exaggeration (though winning California would have put Obama in a stronger spot). As of now, Obama has won more states than Clinton, the onetime favorite, and more delegates. In politics, when you’re in the lead, spin is easy to do. You can simply tell the truth. Shortly after Plouffe was done, political reporters received an email announcing that Clinton officials would be holding their own conference call with reporters to discuss the “state of the race” and their strategy for victory. But Clinton’s new campaign manager would not be participating in the call. After all, she had only been on the job for two days.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate