Interview: “Garfield Minus Garfield” Creator Dan Walsh

 

mojo-photo-gmgstrip.jpgAs we entered the second half of 2008, I thought I’d take a look at Riff page view statistics for the year, just to see what online Mother Jones readers have been clicking on around this fun little blog. And what, dear Riffers, do you think was the number one post of the first six months of 2008? A post mocking George W.’s misinterpretation of a painting? A cynical look at coverage of the Iowa primaries? Abstinence pants? No, no and no. Our most-viewed post was my meditation on the subtext of late-capitalist anxiety in the comic “remix” Garfield Minus Garfield. Riff readers are stoned!

It turns out I was onto something: in the months since the piece’s appearance on the Riff, “G-G” has been covered in The New York Times, Time Magazine, and The Washington Post; the latter tracked down original Garfield creator Jim Davis, who called the work “an inspired thing to do.” So, who’s behind this now-phenomenally-popular bit of inspired photoshoppery? Meet 32-year-old Irishman Dan Walsh, who turns out to be a really nice guy. He answered a few questions via e-mail about the strip.

So, was I onto something with my whole theory that Garfield Minus Garfield is about identification with the “product” in a fractured late capitalist society, or was I full of crap?

Yeah I think you were on to something. It’s Jon’s inability to “fit in.” It’s about being a sad, bored, lonely nerd on a Saturday night. I can’t imagine why it became so successful on the internet 😉

Part of G-G’s appeal is its “bootleg” nature, but interestingly, most mashups are about addition rather than subtraction. Do you identify with “remix culture” or art pranksters like Banksy, or is this just a laugh?

I would say I do identify with the remix culture. I think all artists bootleg to a point (not that I’m claiming to be an artist!). But everything is derivative: music, art, literature. Anyone who says they’re influenced by no-one is lying.

A commenter on my original post compared G-G to removing everyone but Kramer from an episode of Seinfeld, an idea which I thought was spectacular. Do you have any other ideas for subtraction art we should watch out for?

I’ve been wracking my brains for another subtraction premise since G-G took off and I’ve found nothing I’ve been happy with. There’s a particular dynamic between Jon and Garfield that lends itself to the “minus” approach perfectly. Having said that I’d love to see that Seinfeld premise in action.

Why the heck was my post about you so popular?

G-G was insanely popular for a while. I mean crazy popular. My stats company dropped the site because it was screwing up their server and they couldn’t keep up with the traffic. Since then it’s calmed down. But I guess your review appeared on the radar at just the right time.


Check out the Garfield Minus Garfield archive here. Walsh also dropped a hint about a “development” of some sort regarding the strip to be announced soon, so stay tuned! What could it be? Will the Garfield balloon in the Macy’s Parade be replaced by, er, the absence of a balloon?

 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate