Obama Not Telling When He’ll Repeal “Don’t Ask”

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


In January, Sandy Tsao, an army officer based in St. Louis, came out to her bosses as gay. She lost her job, of course—she’s being discharged on May 19. But she’s trying to take the discriminatory Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell policy down with her. Back in January, Tsao wrote a letter to President Barack Obama, asking him to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. On Tuesday, she received a personal, hand-written reply to her letter. “Although it will take some time to complete (partly because it needs Congressional action), I intend to fulfill my commitment!” Obama wrote. He was talking about his commitment to repeal Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell. But gay soldiers like Dan Choi and Sandy Tsao are probably wondering how long “some time” will be. Choi, a West Point Graduate and Arabic linguist, received notice on Thursday that the Army National Guard is also about to fire him for being gay. He will be the first Arabic linguist fired during the Obama administration due to the DADT policy.

Thanks to the Clinton Administration, DADT is a federal law, so Obama is right that it should, theoretically, take congressional action to repeal it. But military law experts aren’t so sure. The Palm Center, a research institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara, announced on Thursday that it is “about to release a study, co-authored by experts in military law, that argues that President Obama has stroke-of-the-pen authority to suspend the gay discharge process via executive order.” Dr. Aaron Belkin, the center’s director, wrote about the potential executive order in the Huffington Post on Thursday. He says it’s very simple:

An executive order would not get rid of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law, but would take the critical step of suspending its implementation, hence rendering it effectively dead. Once people see gays and lesbians serving openly, legally and without problems, it will be much easier to get rid of the law at a later time.

Three-quarters of the public and a majority of Republicans support letting gays serve openly in the military. Sure, Congress will probably eventually repeal the law. But for soldiers like Dan Choi, “eventually” will be too late to save their jobs. If Dr. Belkin is right, Obama is going to need a better explanation in his next letter to Sandy Tsao.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate