Bart, Lisa, Marge, Homer, and…

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The Simpsons celebrated its 20th anniversary on network television last night, with an hour-long special The Simpsons 20th Anniversary Special: In 3D! On Ice”, directed by documentary filmmaker Morgan Spurlock, who wrote, produced, directed, and starred in Super Size Me. It was an exploration of how The Simpsons has affected pop culture, along with the usual celebrity appearances, including a cameo by…Mother Jones magazine.

Back in 1989, Mother Jones art director Kerry Tremain was smart enough to realize that Matt Groening (rhymes with “complaining”) was going to be able to make the jump from his dark, smart, comics which explored how love, work, school, and childhood are hell, to the medium of network television. Groening’s Simpsons animations had appeared on the Tracy Ullman Show for two seasons, but whether the series would appeal to the larger network television audience was still up for grabs. Mother Jones ran a cover story about Groening’s work, which included an image drawn by Groening of Bart and Bongo (the worried child from the “Hell” series) on the cover.

The cover previewed The Simpsons‘ tactic of entertaining while satirizing; it presented Bart and Bongo as approachable, lovable celebrities tweaking the jargon of revolution (Bart: “Kids in TV land—you’re being duped!”) with a punch line that undercut it (Bongo: “We Are?”)

A year and a half later, on the May/June 1991 cover, Tremain again used Groening artwork, this time to illustrate the cover story, “America’s Dirty Little Secret: We Hate Kids”. It worked similarly to the ’89 cover: Lisa Simpson exhorts the reader to “Free the Oppressed Children!”, adding, “Except my brother.” Bart is visible but silent; Lisa has her foot over his mouth.

Several months ago, the production company that’s putting the special together contacted us, asking for permission to use the ’91 cover in the show. We told them about the ’89 cover, and enthusiastically gave them permission to use both. Last night I gleefully watched a media montage of the Simpsons on the cover of Time, Rolling Stone, Playboy, and Mother Jones.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate