More Explosions at Los Alamos

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.


First, we learned that researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico accidentally blew up a building on December 16, 2009 with a Civil War-style cannon. But if that wasn’t bad enough, it turns out that staffers there have been wreaking all kinds of havoc—including three accidental explosions and the accidental electrocution of an employee.

And that’s in just the past 10 months.

A memo dated January 20, 2010, from the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos Site Office, includes a lengthy list of recent safety incidents at their Technical Area facilities, noting that the “relevant recent events include but are not limited to” the list. That includes a “an energetic reaction”—geek speak for “explosion—on July 8, 2009 after a student “erroneously disposed of aceton into a sealed acid waste container.” There was a “rapid energetic reaction” in an oven last month when a researcher attempted to duplicate an experiment, but used “higher constituent concentrations and a pressure vessel instead of glassware.” And on March 20, 2009, “an employee received a 3,500 VDC shock when he inadvertently contacted the high-voltage end of a battery string from a trainer fire-set.”

The memo notes that these accidents are “strikingly similar” to a number of previous incidents at Los Alamos sites over the last eight years: two other accidental explosions in January 2002 and May 2005, a severe eye injury caused by a laser in July 2004, an incident in which a researcher accidentally sprayed acid into his eyes, and an episode where two students accidentally inhaled acid vapors while cleaning glassware in June 2005.

And there’s more. Exactly a year ago, it leaked out that at least 67 computers containing sensitive information were lost or had been stolen from the nation’s major nuclear weapons lab. Los Alamos has also been criticized in the recent past for not properly protecting nuclear materials and for using FedEx to ship a package containing deadly radioactive material.

“The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is concerned about recent safety incidents that have a programmatic or conduct-of-research nexus,” states the memo, which is signed by Joseph C. Vozella, a contracting officer representative at NNSA, and Donald L.Winchell, a manager.

“[T]he commonalities between recent and earlier events indicate that the organizational learning and the sustained focus on improvement necessary for a proactive safety culture have not been embraced across this site,” it states. “Active and aggressive management of event investigations, corrective actions, and effective reviews do not appear to be occurring.”

The Project on Government Oversight (POGO) on Thursday sent a letter to President Barack Obama calling for the White House to urge the Department of Energy to cut funding to Los Alamos until its safety record “markedly improves.”

“This memo shows that the supposed smartest people on the planet are incapable of learning from their mistakes,” said Peter Stockton, a senior investigator with POGO. “Los Alamos will not adequately enforce safety requirements, until DOE begins to properly use its power of the purse.”

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate