More Explosions at Los Alamos

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


First, we learned that researchers at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico accidentally blew up a building on December 16, 2009 with a Civil War-style cannon. But if that wasn’t bad enough, it turns out that staffers there have been wreaking all kinds of havoc—including three accidental explosions and the accidental electrocution of an employee.

And that’s in just the past 10 months.

A memo dated January 20, 2010, from the Department of Energy’s Los Alamos Site Office, includes a lengthy list of recent safety incidents at their Technical Area facilities, noting that the “relevant recent events include but are not limited to” the list. That includes a “an energetic reaction”—geek speak for “explosion—on July 8, 2009 after a student “erroneously disposed of aceton into a sealed acid waste container.” There was a “rapid energetic reaction” in an oven last month when a researcher attempted to duplicate an experiment, but used “higher constituent concentrations and a pressure vessel instead of glassware.” And on March 20, 2009, “an employee received a 3,500 VDC shock when he inadvertently contacted the high-voltage end of a battery string from a trainer fire-set.”

The memo notes that these accidents are “strikingly similar” to a number of previous incidents at Los Alamos sites over the last eight years: two other accidental explosions in January 2002 and May 2005, a severe eye injury caused by a laser in July 2004, an incident in which a researcher accidentally sprayed acid into his eyes, and an episode where two students accidentally inhaled acid vapors while cleaning glassware in June 2005.

And there’s more. Exactly a year ago, it leaked out that at least 67 computers containing sensitive information were lost or had been stolen from the nation’s major nuclear weapons lab. Los Alamos has also been criticized in the recent past for not properly protecting nuclear materials and for using FedEx to ship a package containing deadly radioactive material.

“The National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA) is concerned about recent safety incidents that have a programmatic or conduct-of-research nexus,” states the memo, which is signed by Joseph C. Vozella, a contracting officer representative at NNSA, and Donald L.Winchell, a manager.

“[T]he commonalities between recent and earlier events indicate that the organizational learning and the sustained focus on improvement necessary for a proactive safety culture have not been embraced across this site,” it states. “Active and aggressive management of event investigations, corrective actions, and effective reviews do not appear to be occurring.”

The Project on Government Oversight (POGO) on Thursday sent a letter to President Barack Obama calling for the White House to urge the Department of Energy to cut funding to Los Alamos until its safety record “markedly improves.”

“This memo shows that the supposed smartest people on the planet are incapable of learning from their mistakes,” said Peter Stockton, a senior investigator with POGO. “Los Alamos will not adequately enforce safety requirements, until DOE begins to properly use its power of the purse.”

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate