Udall Talks Senate Reform

Test Ticker

Please support Mother Jones with a year-end donation. The truth is, we're a long way from our $600,000 goal, and we have to get as close as we can by Tuesday so we don't have to make hard decisions come January. If you value our reporting, please consider pitching in today.

$600,000

We still need to raise 400,000: Whether you can give $5 or $500, it all matters.

Please support Mother Jones with a year-end donation. We need to raise $600,000, or get as close as we can, by Tuesday so we don't need to make hard decisions come January. Whether you can give $5 or $500, it all makes a difference.

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/midgetbusdriver/3662945409/" target="_blank">Erica Reid</a> (Creative Commons)

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.

Sen. Tom Udall, a freshman Democrat from New Mexico, has raised some eyebrows with a resolution (pdf) to adopt a new set of rules (and possibly scrap the filibuster) at the start of the 112th Congress. I spoke with the Senator yesterday about the prospects for reform and what specifically he hoped to accomplish. Among the main points:

History repeating? Udall, whose “constitutional option” bears the same name as the failed Republican reform in 2005, doesn’t believe the Democratic efforts have much in common with GOP’s failed attempt to abolish the filibuster.
Will it catch on? Despite low recognition among the general public, Udall believes the reforms will be a winner with his constituents.
Don’t expect much bombthrowing: Udall expects procedural reform to be a bi-partisan issue, but did not want to get “stuck in the weeds” discussing specific changes.

You can read the full piece here.