Outcasts in Washington, BP Turns to … Indiana?

Flickr/<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/75905404@N00/505688957/">OZinOH</a> (<a href="http://www.creativecommons.org">Creative Commons</a>).

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


BP’s donations to federal candidates have stopped in the three months since the Deepwater Horizon disaster began. But that doesn’t mean the oil giant has stopped all political activity. BP’s political action committee spent nothing on federal candidates in June, according to a new report from the Center for Responsive Politics. But the company’s PAC gave $27,300 to candidates for state office–and that’s not including the free tickets to see Britney Spears or the Sacramento Kings.

All 80 recipients in June were from Indiana; in May the company gave $8,250 in contributions to 10 state-level candidates in California. The company has clearly been spending less on candidates, but it’s not hard up for cash. In June the PAC reported $19,800 in income and had $299,500 in cash on hand at the end of the month.

BP PAC’s scaled back investment in federal candidates is perhaps unsurprising. No one–not even the lawmakers who have defended BP in hearings—wants to be caught taking money from the company right now. House Energy Committee member Charlie Gonzalez (D-Texas) was the only federal candidate offered money from the PAC in May, and he pledged to not accept BP’s check. “They’re certainly been a lot of political push back,” said Michael Beckel, a former Mother Jones editorial fellow who reports on money in politics for CRP. “We’ve seen Democrats and Republicans pledge to refuse contributions, pledge to return contributions, or donate the money to charity to get rid of taint that might be associated with taking money from BP right now.”

BP’s PAC has donated more than $79,000 to federal candidates since January 2009, but that was before this oil disaster got in the way of their blatant attempts to influence federal policy.

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate