McCain Now Says Climate Science Might be “Flawed”


Brad Johnson at Wonk Room recently flagged a video of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), once the Republican party’s champion of action on climate change, sliding farther into denial. In an event promoting New Hampshire Republican Senate candidate Kelly Ayotte, McCain went so far as question whether the climate is changing and indicate that the science might be “flawed”:

I think it’s an inexact science, and there has been more and more questioning about some of the conclusions that were reached concerning climate change. And I believe that everybody in the world deserves correct answers whether the scientific conclusions were flawed by outside influences. There’s great questions about it that need to be resolved.

Now, this is the same guy who said in 2007: “[U]nequivocally I believe that it’s real. I believe there’s enough evidence out there to convince us at least to try to take action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.” He also pledged, as a candidate for president in 2008, “I will clean up the planet… I will make global warming a priority.”

McCain has been backing off the climate issue ever since Obama won the election. First he attacked Obama’s approach to dealing with the issue, and then he disavowed ever having endorsed legislative efforts to address it. But this latest is a new low. Not only does he no longer care about passing legislation to address the issue, he’s using the ginned-up controversy over leaked emails to attack the underlying science.

Todd Purdham’s lengthy Vanity Fair essay exploring “What happened?” to McCain may help explain McCain’s latest comments. Purdham argues that the person and the senator many thought McCain to be may never have existed at all. Instead, McCain’s “beliefs” were guided by self-preservation or the desire for political advancement rather than any kind of principle. While this theory makes it less surprising that McCain would do a 180 on climate, it doesn’t make it any less disappointing.

Here’s the video of McCain’s New Hampshire appearance:

 

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate