Black Writers and English Teachers on Huck Finn

Illustration: The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.


Should a bowdlerized version of Mark Twain’s The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn be taught in high school English classes? As the only African-American student in my English class when this book was assigned, I can assure you that 219 repetitions of the word “nigger” were discomforting at best. But I don’t entirely agree with MoJo blogger Kevin Drum‘s take on NewSouth Books’ forthcoming censored Huck, which replaces “nigger” with “slave.” Writes Kevin:

The problem with Huckleberry Finn is that, like it or not, most high school teachers only have two choices these days: teach a bowdlerized version or don’t teach it at all. It’s simply no longer possible to assign a book to American high school kids that assaults them with the word nigger so relentlessly.

I sat down with Mission High School English teacher Tadd Scott this week to see what he—an African-American teacher in a primarily non-white high school—had to say about teaching Huck Finn. (He assigned it when he taught American Literature to high school juniors and seniors.)

How did he deal with the text? Well, students weren’t allowed to say the word “nigger” in his classroom anyway, he explains. Instead they skipped over it or used the “N-word” phrase instead when talking about the book.

But how did they feel about the word itself in the text? Students were offended by it. “It’s like ‘faggot’ and other horrible, demeaning words,” he says. Still, he doesn’t think the text should be rewritten. “I’m an artist,” he says. “I don’t believe in changing someone’s art. Leave it as it is.” If the goal is to introduce students before college to Mark Twain’s writing, he advises teaching Tom Sawyer excerpts or The Celebrated Jumping Frog of Calaveras County. If it’s to introduce high school students to the realities of slavery, assigning slave narratives like this one would be a better choice.

“America right now is not white, it’s multicultural. So ‘American literature’ should probably reflect that.”

Besides the “n-word,” NewSouth Books is also changing the word “Injun Joe” to “Indian Joe” and “half-breed” to “half-blood,” which this Native American blog discusses. But there are plenty of reasons—other than the book’s inclusion of historic slurs—why English teachers could choose to teach other texts in American Literature classes, Scott explains. “Who was Huck Finn written for? At the time, it was written for a largely white male population, maybe a few women got it. But America right now is not white, it’s multicultural,” he says. “So ‘American literature’ should probably reflect that.” One American Lit option he recommends is Langston Hughes’ Mulatto: A Play of the Deep South, the first black play performed on Broadway. Another choice: Black Boy, by Richard Wright. Both have been well-loved by his students, he says.

Scott remembers reading Huck Finn when he was 15 as a black student in a mostly white class. “All my teachers of English were white men and white women, and maybe they didn’t have the background to understand. But I never saw great black women or men writers during my high school experience, and I do know that I want my people to see themselves in literature in a wonderful way.”

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

BEFORE YOU CLICK AWAY!

“Lying.” “Disgusting.” “Scum.” “Slime.” “Corrupt.” “Enemy of the people.” Donald Trump has always made clear what he thinks of journalists. And it’s plain now that his administration intends to do everything it can to stop journalists from reporting things they don’t like—which is most things that are true.

No one gets to tell Mother Jones what to publish or not publish, because no one owns our fiercely independent newsroom. But that also means we need to directly raise the resources it takes to keep our journalism alive. There’s only one way for that to happen, and it’s readers like you stepping up. Please help with a donation today if you can—even a few bucks will make a real difference. A monthly gift would be incredible.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate