Lara Logan: Reporting Rape vs. Sexual Assault

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


CBS has been (understandably) quiet about the sexual assault reporter Lara Logan sustained while in Tahrir Square. In fact, the network released only one statement noting that Logan had endured “a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating” before being rescued by women and Egyptian soldiers. Several news outlets ran with the story, quickly throwing up 30-point headlines that Logan had been “raped.” Since then, the Wall Street Journal has quoted an anonymous source close to the matter who says Logan’s assault was indeed assault, and not rape. In absence of further statements from CBS or Logan herself, there’s nothing to make reporters assume the assault was rape rather than sexual assault. Briefly, sexual assault is an umbrella charge that can include rape, but it’s not synonymous with rape. Usually, rape implies penetration or intercourse, while sexual assault is a much broader category of crimes including everything from groping to sexual harrassment to verbal attacks.

Most of the press, including major media, were careful to maintain CBS’s wording that Logan had been “sexually assaulted” rather than “raped.” But the media outlets that did report Logan had been raped did so unevenly and in contradictory terms. At times, the headline of a story would say Logan had been raped, but the actual story reported she’d been assaulted. In other instances, “rape” was only in the URL or Google News headline. In one confusing example, a San Francisco Chronicle blog quotes an unspecified source as saying Logan had been “brutally raped and assaulted.” Further examples are below. 

The larger implications of this story are the lack of training, awareness, and accountability for the sexual assaults and harassment routinely encountered by female reporters in the field. Mother Jones‘s fearless human rights reporter, Mac McClelland, has an excellent post on that subject here. For me, it was disappointing to see that even though CBS only released a single, three-paragraph statement, it was still misrepresented by several media outlets. 

Melbourne Herald Sun: Logan is listed as raped in story headline, but not in story itself

 

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Radar: Word “rape” is in tags and URL of piece, but not used in story

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LA Weekly: Logan reported as “raped repeatedly”

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

MediaBistro: Rape is in Google News dek, not in story itself

 

 

Babble: In one Babble story, Logan is “under attack” in the headline, but “raped” in the story. In the second story, Logan has had an “assault” in the headline, but the story says she was interchangably “assaulted” and “raped”.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate