Rising Dem Opposition to Key Part of Obama’s Deficit Plan

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


When President Barack Obama delivered his big deficit speech this week, he didn’t offer many details. But when it came to savings in the health-care sector, the president made an exception, and got into the nitty gritty. Stressing the urgency of reining in health-care costs—the single biggest driver of government spending—Obama vowed to build upon the cost-containment measures in the Affordable Care Act, the landmark health reform bill he signed last year. One key feature of the new law is an independent Medicare panel that will have new authority to set payment rates and evaluate health-care spending. In his speech, Obama promised to slow the growth of Medicare costs even further by strengthening the authority of the panel, known as the Independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB).

Unfortunately for the president, the Medicare panel is also one of the most widely misunderstood and reviled parts of health-care reform. Republicans have already launched an effort to repeal the commission, dubbing it the new “death panel.” What’s more, a growing number of Democrats are joining their effort to kill the panel, putting another thorn in Obama’s side.

Rep. Allyson Schwartz (D-Pa.) recently became the latest Democrat to sign onto the House Republicans’ IPAB repeal bill. As Politico reports, the conservative Blue Dog New Dem* is “the most high-profile Democrat yet” to join the GOP’s effort to scrap the payment board. While Republicans have slammed the panel for allowing faceless bureaucrats to “ration” care, Democratic opponents have taken a different tack—they criticize the panel for having the authority to bypass Congress. “Abdicating this responsibility, whether to insurance companies or an unelected commission, would undermine our ability to represent the needs of the seniors and disabled in our communities,” Schwartz wrote in a letter explaining her position.

Schwartz has now becoming the third House Democrat to support the Republican IPAB repeal effort: she joins Rep. Michael Capuano (D-Mass.), a member of the Progressive Caucus, and Rep. Shelley Berkley (D-Nev.), a centrist New Democrat who’s now running for Senate. The Medicare panel was never popular among House Dems, who refused to include it in their version of the health-care bill, with opposition coming from both liberal and conservative flanks of the party. 

So while Obama want to strengthen IPAB to bring down the deficit, members of his own party want to dismantle it altogether. The lack of Democratic unity behind this central pillar of Obama’s plan reveals just how difficult it will be to reduce the deficit in any meaningful way. 

*This has been corrected. Sorry.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate