The War Over Walid Phares’ Wikipedia Page

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Lebanon’s brutal civil war may have officially ended more than two decades ago, but the battle to define its roots and meaning continues…on Wikipedia.

As I discovered while reporting this story on Mitt Romney’s Middle East policy adviser Walid Phares, the Wiki pages of major groups, events, and figures in Lebanon are under constant revision by partisans on all sides. Phares’ page was a particular hotbed of activity, which was strange, given that his role was in the Lebanese Forces was mostly unreported by the Western media and, unlike his former associate Samir Geagea, he doesn’t play an ongoing role in Lebanon’s domestic political drama. Many other actors from the war still do, which is part of why there’s so much activity on their pages and so much disagreement about what to include.

At any rate, take a look at the pace of revisions and counter-revisions that have taken place on Phares’ Wikipedia page just since my story was published Thursday morning, and even over the past month:

There have been nearly a hundred edits to Phares’ Wikipedia page during October alone, most involving his relationship to the Lebanese Forces; the edit wars on his page go back to 2005. His defenders frequently scrub the page of any lines referring to that relationship (some of which really have been inaccurate and inflammatory). It’s not clear that the users are actually different people. After TEOS2011 was flagged as a possible sock-puppet, another user, JudgeDredd1975 (who has an extraordinary knowledge of Mr. Phares’ bibliography), showed up to defend TEOS2011 writing, “I have no idea who is TEOS2011, although we apparently share the same values of keeping Wikipedia’s integrity by not letting it become a platform for cheap defamation[.]” Both JudgeDredd1975 and TEOS2011, among other users editing Phares’ page, have a limited interest in Wikipedia: Their only revisions have been to Phares’ page.

From October to November 2008, Phares’ page was edited extensively by a user called “futureofterrorismproject.” Phares’ title at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, according to his online bio, was the “director for Future Terrorism Project at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies.” His or her edits however, were mostly additions to Phares qualifications, not attempts to scrub the page of information related to Phares’ role in Lebanon’s civil war. 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate