Romney Flip-Flops on Blaming Obama for Jobs Crisis

Mitt Romney.<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/seth/399340323/sizes/m/in/photostream/">/sethrubenstein/Flickr

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.


Add another entry to the long-running list of GOP presidential candidate Mitt Romney’s flip-flops. At Sunday’s NBC/Facebook debate in Concord, Romney took a question about the nation’s woeful labor market and his criticism of President Obama’s economic plan. Romney tempered his attacks on Obama by noting, “I don’t blame him for the recession and the jobs crisis.”

But in his campaign’s 87-page economic plan, Romney does just that. If you look closely at Romney’s depiction of the Great Recession and ensuing, lingering jobs crisis, he blames Obama for the nation’s jobs crisis. Released in September 2011, Romney’s plan highlights a period from 2007 to 2009, showing how during this period 8.7 million jobs were lost in the Great Recession and another 800,000 were shed in the immediate aftermath of the recession. Amazingly, Romney’s economic plan calls this period the “Obama Recovery.” Here’s the graph to prove it:

Mitt Romney campaign.Mitt Romney campaign.

It’s chart fraud at its finest. The years 2007 and 2008, of course, were the final two of the Bush administration. The jobs crisis was at its worst during those years, including a staggering 2.6 million jobs lost in 2008. And those years have nothing to do with the “Obama recovery.”

Nor was this Romney’s only misrepresentation of Obama’s jobs record. As Tim Murphy noted, Romney falsely claimed he created more jobs as governor of Massachusetts in the 2000s than Obama has as president. In reality, Romney used the same bogus math to make this claim as he did when blaming the the nation’s unemployment woes on Obama.

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you'll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Or at least we hope. It’s fall fundraising time, and we’re trying to raise $250,000 to help fund Mother Jones’ journalism during a shorter than normal three-week push.

If you’re reading this, a fundraising pitch at the bottom of an article, you must find our team’s reporting valuable and we hope you’ll consider supporting it with a donation of any amount right now if you can.

It’s really that simple. But if you’d like to read a bit more, our membership lead, Brian Hiatt, has a post for you highlighting some of our newsroom's impressive, impactful work of late—including two big investigations in just one day and covering voting rights the way it needs to be done—that we hope you’ll agree is worth supporting.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate