Why We Should Be Scared for Our Coastlines, in 55 Acronyms

A beach house in North Carolina after Hurricane Sandy. <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/69214385@N04/8235405166/sizes/z/in/photostream">Don McCullough</a>/Flickr

This story first appeared on the Atlantic website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

This week, a group of 78 representatives from American government agencies, universities, non-governmental organizations, and the insurance industry published a report on the threat climate change poses to U.S. coastlines. The document—formal title: “Coastal Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerabilities: A Technical Input to the National Climate Assessment”—clocks in at nearly 200 pages, and functions as a lengthy addendum to the U.S. Global Change Research Program’s National Climate Assessment.

The report’s findings are unsurprising: Our coastlines are particularly vulnerable to climate change’s impacts—a fact that we have had proven to us anecdotally so many sad times in the recent past. Still, though, the document is worth reading—or, perhaps, skimming—in its entirety.

If you don’t have time to read a 200-page report, you can also get a pretty good sense of the nation’s climate-to-coastline situation by skimming the report in another way: by looking at the list of acronym decodings that the report helpfully provides for its readers. There are 55 of those acronyms in all, and they are illuminating and terrifying in equal measure. SLCS? That means “sea level change scenarios.” HABs? “Harmful algae blooms.” VBZD? “Vector-borne and zoonotic disease.” CSO? “Combined sewer overflow.”

Yes. And the list goes on—helpfully, horrifically—abbreviation after abbreviation.

slide-12-1024.jpg acro2.jpg

But maybe the scariest one of all? BMP: “Best management practices.”

Here’s the full report:

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate