Kaleka Distances Himself From Alien Theories, 9/11 Conspiracies

Filmmaker and congressional aspirant Amardeep Kaleka tells Mother Jones he isn’t a truther.

Screenshot from Sirius trailer

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


“To be fair, there were a couple of scientists you say were killed under mysterious circumstances in the movie,” I told the congressional candidate. “I’m sorry, I don’t necessarily remember all of their names.” It was the strangest thing I’ve said during an interview. But when you write an article about an alien conspiracy documentary directed by a wannabe congressman, it leads to unusual conversation.

On Thursday, Mother Jones reported that Amardeep Kaleka, a Democrat running in the primary to challenge Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), had directed, edited, and provided the “story idea” for Sirius, a documentary that contends that aliens have visited Earth and that vague corporate and governmental powers suppress alternative energy technologies, while scientists who dare to challenge the status quo die under mysterious circumstances. The film is based on a book written by Steven Greer, a former doctor and current amateur ufologist.

I spoke with Kaleka for about 45 minutes Friday afternoon. Kaleka, who had been traveling and was unable to be reached for the original article, was not thrilled with the piece. “You guys got caught up in a spin,” Kaleka said. “What Paul Ryan is doing, what [Rob] Zerban [the other Democrat running in the primary] is doing is they’re slamming that out to resurface an image of who I am and what I am. That’s incredibly weird considering there’s a lot of things—there are so many military scientists and military witnesses in the film if you watch the film, that you would probably have to mention that in your journal.”

Kaleka defended the quality of his film, arguing that it raised important questions, but distanced himself from the project whenever I asked him about its controversial claims. Sirius opens with the logo of the production company Kaleka co-founded, and he’s credited as editor, director, and coming up with the “story idea.” He even appears in the film at one point, billed as a UFO “witness.” But when we spoke, he said the documentary doesn’t reflect his own personal views. “Think about the director from Breaking Bad for a second,” Kaleka said. “Does that mean, because he took the contract, and he cooks meth, a former teacher who sells it and kills people, does that mean he condones it? Or does that mean that he himself is party to that? Or is he just doing his contract like a filmmaker does?”

He continued: “I’m a director. [If] I made Pretty Woman, I don’t have to side with the fact that I’m pro-prostitute.” He also compared his role of documentarian to the filmmakers behind The Blair Witch Project and Paranormal Activity.

Kaleka’s also objected to being characterized as a 9/11 truther. About midway through Sirius, Kaleka’s narrator calls the 9/11 attacks a “false flag” intended to dupe the public and feed the military-industrial complex. During our conversation, Kaleka rejected the truther label. But he still questions the official accounts of the attacks. In the film, he said, “we use [9/11] as an example of something not going right, and then we don’t know who’s behind or what’s behind. It could be a major tragedy that nobody could control or knows what’s happened. That’s where I would side.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate