No, “Her” Director Spike Jonze Does Not Look at Siri in a Sexual Light

Courtesy of Warner Bros.

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Spike Jonze’s Her (Warner Bros., 126 min.) is being hailed as one of the funniest, most delightful, and best films you’ll see all year. It’s also the only one in which you’ll get to see Joaquin Phoenix have sex with a computer.

The sci-fi romance is set in futuristic Los Angeles and tells the story of Theodore Twombly (Phoenix), a heartbroken man who falls in love with Samantha, the disembodied voice and personality of his computer and smartphone operating system. The “OS” (voiced by Scarlett Johansson) engages in a lot of playful, affectionate, and human conversation with Theodore, and you can listen to some of it here:

Samantha and Theodore do all the serious-relationship-y stuff that comes standard: They go on double dates, embark on mild adventures, argue from time to time, and, yes, make glorious love. (Theodore has something of an out-of-body experience when they consummate their relationship.)

Understandably, the fictional Samantha has attracted comparisons to the real-life Siri, which is the artificially intelligent, often female-voiced personal assistant that is supported on many of Apple’s iPhones and iPads. You can ask Siri to do things for you and you can have conversations with Siri. Siri is also known for its love of libertarian icon Ron Paul, and for advising a befuddled Zooey Deschanel.

So, yeah, Samantha is like a super-advanced Siri, voiced by ScarJo. (Jonze’s story was actually first inspired by instant-messaging technology that he discovered years before Siri came along.) “Some filmmakers create art that reflects the world [while] Spike Jonze (Being John Malkovich, Adaptation) creates movies that make us see the world in startling new ways,” gushed Rolling Stone critic Peter Travers. Fair enough. But did all his years of bringing Her to life lead Jonze to view the world—specifically, technology like Siri and Samantha—in a new light? Jonze was nice enough to humor me about this subject when he was in Washington, DC, last week for a Q&A session. Our conversation is posted below.

Me: After spending so much time making this movie, do you now look at, say, Siri any differently, whether sexually, emotionally, or intellectually?

Jonze: All the above! (Chuckles.) Actually, no, not at all. I mean, it’s such a different thing [from what’s in Her]. And Siri, it doesn’t really do all that much. So… no.

Me: So no new urges, then?

Jonze: No.

There you have it, in case you were dying to know.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate