This Anti-Gay-Marriage Group Is Really Excited That It Just Helped Elect Pro-Gay-Marriage Candidates

The National Organization for Marriage rejoices at the defeat of three pro-gay-marriage Republicans in the midterm elections—and sets its sights on 2016.

NOM hosted a March for Marriage in Washington, DC, in June 2014. <a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/perspective/14474200596">Elvert Barnes</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


The National Organization for Marriage, a conservative group that campaigns against same-sex marriage, popped the cork for some post-midterms rejoicing on Monday. On its website, the organization “claimed victory” in last week’s elections, gleefully celebrating Democrats’ wins over three Republicans who supported same-sex marriage. But NOM’s joy is a bit misplaced: The Democrats who won support the same policies the group is fighting against.

As I noted back in October, NOM targeted GOP Senate candidate Monica Wehby in Oregon (who endorsed same-sex marriage), and two openly gay Republican House candidates, Carl DeMaio in California and Richard Tisei in Massachusetts. All three lost last week. “I hope that our success in defeating these three Republican candidates sends a message to the Republican leadership in Washington,” NOM president Brian Brown said in the statement, “that the GOP faithful demands candidates who are committed to defending marriage, which is a critical element of the Republican platform.”

But the candidates who defeated Wehby, DeMaio, and Tisei are no friendlier to NOM’s cause than their vanquished foes. Sen. Jeff Merkley in Oregon introduced the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA), which would ban employers hiring or firing workers based on their sexual orientation, and guided it to passage in the Senate. DeMaio’s opponent, Rep. Scott Peters, had the backing of a number of LGBT groups during his campaign. Seth Moulton, the Democrat who defeated Tisei, blasted NOM when the group said they were supporting him in the race. “Fighting against groups, like NOM, that deny equality as a basic human right will be a priority of Seth’s in Congress,” his spokeswoman told Metro Weekly shortly before Election Day. All three Democrats support same-sex marriage.

Brown and his colleagues are already hoping to use the next presidential campaign to deter Republicans from supporting marriage equality. In its post-midterm blog post, NOM singled out Sen. Rob Portman, a Republican who has been publicly toying with the idea of a presidential run and endorsed same-sex marriage last year after his son came out of the closet. “Rob Portman can forget about getting elected President of the United States,” said Brown, NOM’s president. “If he runs we will make sure that GOP primary voters are aware of his desire to redefine marriage.”

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate