Joni Ernst Is Giving the GOP Rebuttal to Obama’s State of the Union Speech. Here’s What You Need to Know About Her.

The new Iowa senator is scheduled to respond to the president’s big speech Tuesday night.

Brian Cahn/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Republican leaders selected Joni Ernst, Iowa’s new senator, to deliver the party’s response to President Obama’s State of the Union address Tuesday night. Rebutting the president is an honor parties often give to a rising star—a way to introduce a Future Leader of The Party to a primetime, national audience. It’s also a thankless task; Republicans have frequently flubbed the speech during Obama’s years in office.

But in many ways, Ernst is the perfect choice for the Republican rebuttal, because she personifies the fusion of the tea party and the GOP establishment. As I wrote in a feature on Ernst shortly before the election:

If elected, Ernst would almost certainly be among the most conservative senators in the country. Yet she owes her rise to prominence not to the tea party, but to the Rotary Club types—the GOP establishment, which urged her to run and bet that her biography and folksy political charm would matter far more than her extreme policy positions. She is somehow both the handpicked champion of the mainline business-minded wing of the Republican Party and a hard-right conservative reactionary—the logical end-result of the ongoing merger of the tea party and the rest of the GOP.

Ernst’s combination of right-wing and mainstream support isn’t her only strength. She also has a deeply appealing personal story and an easy manner that distracts voters and journalists from her extreme policy positions. Although she began to tone down her rhetoric at the end of her Senate campaign, Ernst holds a host of fringe views. She thinks the Department of Education and the EPA should be eradicated. She wondered about United Nations plots to take over Iowa farm land. She wants same-sex marriage to be illegal. She called Obama a dictator. She dislikes the federal minimum wage and has said states can nullify any federal law they dislike. And she’s thrown her weight behind a “personhood” amendment that would grant full legal rights to fetuses.

None of these views are likely to get an airing on Tuesday night. Instead, Ernst will probably adopt the same tactic she relied on last fall: trumpeting her appealing personal story and glossing over messy policy details. 

But Ernst can’t avoid her beliefs entirely. Florida Rep. Carlos Curbelo is slotted to delivery a Spanish-language translation of Ernst’s response—a fine bit of ironic juxtaposition since, as I reported in October, Ernst thinks that the government should declare English the official language of the country.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate