Republicans’ First Question for Hillary Clinton at Today’s Benghazi Hearing Was Very Telling

They’re not just trying to blame for the attack but the entire Libya policy.

Benghazi Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, left, talks with the committee's ranking Democrat, Elijah Cummings, on October 22, 2015, prior to the start of the committee's hearing on Benghazi.Evan Vucci/AP

Let our journalists help you make sense of the noise: Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily newsletter and get a recap of news that matters.


The first Republican to grill Hillary Clinton at Thursday’s House Benghazi committee hearing did not ask about the attack at the US diplomatic compound or about problems of security there. Instead, he tried to establish another talking point that could be useful for Republicans in 2016: the then-secretary of state was responsible for the Obama administration’s decision to intervene in Libya in 2011 and, therefore, is to blame for the Benghazi attacks and everything else that has happened in that chaos-ridden country ever since.

Rep. Pete Roskam (R-Ill.) depicted Clinton as the main driver of President Barack Obama’s decision to intervene in Libya, crediting her with bringing both the White House and the international community on board. “There were senior voices within the White House that were opposed to military action—Vice President Biden, Department of Defense, Secretary Gates, the National Security Council, and so forth. But you persuaded President Obama to intervene militarily. Isn’t that right?”

When Clinton noted that a number of US allies were pressuring the Obama administration to take action, Roskam said, “I think you are underselling yourself.”

He continued:

So, to put this in totality, you were able to overcome opposition within the State Department. You were able to persuade the president. You were able to persuade the United Nations and the international community. You made the call to the Arabs and brought them home. You saw it. You drove it. You articulated it. And you persuaded people. Did I get that wrong?

Our Libya policy couldn’t have happened without you because you were its chief architect…After your plan, things in Libya today are a disaster.

It was a strange inquiry to begin with, and it seemed designed to fault Clinton for the entire Libya policy. Democrats on the Benghazi committee were quick to respond, blasting out an email noting that “the international community concluded that if it did not intervene, Qadhafi would slaughter thousands of Libyans.” The email noted that Republicans including Sens. John McCain and Marco Rubio agreed that action was needed.

Some reporters tweeted their bemusement at Roskam’s grilling of Clinton.

These opening questions had little to do with what happened at the Benghazi compound. But they sure could yield clips useful for a Republican attack ad.

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. It's our first time asking for an outpouring of support since screams of FAKE NEWS and so much of what Trump stood for made everything we do so visceral. Like most newsrooms, we face incredibly hard budget realities, and it's unnerving needing to raise big money when traffic is down.

So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

IT'S NOT THAT WE'RE SCREWED WITHOUT TRUMP:

"It's that we're screwed with or without him if we can't show the public that what we do matters for the long term," writes Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein as she kicks off our drive to raise $350,000 in donations from readers by July 17.

This is a big one for us. So, as we ask you to consider supporting our team's journalism, we thought we'd slow down and check in about where Mother Jones is and where we're going after the chaotic last several years. This comparatively slow moment is also an urgent one for Mother Jones: You can read more in "Slow News Is Good News," and if you're able to, please support our team's hard-hitting journalism and help us reach our big $350,000 goal with a donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate