Donald Trump Stayed So On-Message at AIPAC He Used a Teleprompter

The bombastic real estate mogul likes to speak off the cuff—but not in front of the powerful Israel lobby.

Evan Vucci/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump’s speech at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s annual policy conference on Monday foreboded controversy. His stances on minority rights and his seemingly ambivalent comments about Israel prompted suspicions and threats of a large boycott. But the speech turned out to be a lovefest as Trump toed the conference’s pro-Israel line and the crowd rewarded him in spades for it.

“I am a lifelong supporter and true friend of Israel,” he told the crowd, earning the first of many bouts of applause. “I am a newcomer to politics but not to backing the Jewish state.”

Many attendees had pledged to walk out of Trump’s speech to protest his comments against Muslims, immigrants, and other groups throughout the campaign. “Mr. Trump embodies senseless hatred, because what we’ve seen throughout this campaign is that whoever isn’t like him, he attacks: women, immigrants, the disabled, the press,” Rabbi David Paskin, one of the leaders of a protest group called Come Together Against the Hate, told the Daily Beast. But a large-scale walkout never materialized. While a small group of people left the crowded floor of Washington’s Verizon Center, Trump spoke in front of a packed house that gave him warm and frequent ovations.

For his part, Trump stuck closely to the standard AIPAC script. The conference is usually a venue for politicians from both parties to praise Israel lavishly, reaffirm America’s undying political and financial support for the country, bash Palestinian leadership, and talk about their own lengthy love affairs with the Jewish state. Trump threw red meat to the crowd on all those fronts and spent a lengthy chunk of his speech attacking Iran and the nuclear accord it signed with the United States. “My No. 1 priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran,” he said. “This deal is a catastrophe for America, for Israel, and for the whole of the Middle East.”

Trump also got huge applause for cheering the end of President Barack Obama’s time in office. “He may be the worst thing to ever happen to Israel, believe me,” he said.

The speech was dramatically different from Trump’s previous comments on Israel. Despite calling himself “very pro-Israel,” the GOP front-runner has staked out positions rarely heard from mainstream American politicians, especially Republicans. He said during a debate earlier this month that the United States should be “neutral” in any negotiations between Israel and the Palestinians, and he told reporters just hours before his speech that Israel should start paying for some of the billions of dollars in foreign aid America gives it each year. That stance put him at odds with decades of US policy and the rest of the 2016 field, but it’s one he shared with hundreds of pro-Palestinian demonstrators who gathered outside the conference demanding a stop to aid to Israel.

Those comments allowed Clinton to attack Trump as a danger to Israeli security during her own speech earlier in the day. “We need steady hands, not a president who says he’s neutral on Monday, pro-Israel on Tuesday, and who-knows-what on Wednesday because ‘everything’s negotiable,'” she said on Monday morning. But by the end of Trump’s unusually focused address—in contrast to his rambling campaign events, he used a teleprompter and stayed firmly on his pro-Israel message—the crowd cheered the GOP front-runner’s own attack on Clinton, whom he called a “total disaster” on Israel.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate