How Right-Wing Talk Radio Helped Cruz Overtake Trump in Wisconsin

A big lead has turned into a big deficit for the Republican front-runner.

Curtis Means/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


On Monday morning, Donald Trump phoned into Charlie Sykes’ Wisconsin radio show as the Republican front-runner turned his attention to the next major contest on the presidential nominating calendar. Sykes, the most influential radio talker on the state’s conservative political scene, immediately launched into a harsh line of questioning that put Trump on his heels.

“Before you called into my show, did you know that I’m a hashtag-NeverTrump guy?” Sykes asked, catching Trump clearly unaware. Sykes challenged Trump on his past misogynistic comments about women—playing a clip from an anti-Trump ad for emphasis—and asked whether Trump’s proposals to slap high tariffs on imports would hurt industry in the state, before jabbing at him for his less-than-genteel remarks about his opponents (and, on occasion, their spouses).

Right-wing talk radio often serves as a voice for the conservative grassroots, in opposition to the political establishment. But in Wisconsin this election cycle, it’s played the reverse role, helping turn Trump’s once-sizable lead in the polls into a deficit and bolstering the candidate who’s become the grudging favorite of the Republican Party’s mainstream.

Sykes has led the anti-Trump charge among the activist and establishment class in the staunchly Republican suburbs surrounding Milwaukee, a group that over the past few weeks has coalesced around Ted Cruz as its candidate of choice. A poll from the respected outfit at Marquette Law School released Wednesday has Cruz leading the field in Wisconsin with 40 percent of Republican voters, trailed by Trump at 30 percent and John Kasich at 21 percent. The prognosticators at FiveThirtyEight now give Cruz an 89 percent chance of winning the state.

Wisconsin is not obviously strong territory for Cruz, a Texan and evangelical champion who was expected to sweep the South. But as other candidates dropped out—first Jeb Bush, then Ben Carson, and finally Marco Rubio—Cruz has managed to pick up many of their supporters and open up a solid lead in the state.

Shortly before the latest Marquette survey came out, Charles Franklin, a professor of government who oversees the Marquette Law School poll, predicted that Cruz would gain substantial support from the candidates who left the race. “If you put Rubio, plus Carson, plus Bush together in our February poll, that was 31 percent of the poll just there,” he said. “If that 31 percent for the dropouts moves mostly to Cruz, then that puts him ahead of Trump, even if Trump picks up a little bit of it. There is a lot of free vote on the table right now.”

His forecast came to pass: Cruz went from 10 points behind Trump in Marquette’s February poll to 10 points ahead this month. So how was Cruz, rather than Trump, able to take so many of those votes that were on the table? Part of the answer lies with conservative talk radio.

Talk radio in the Milwaukee suburbs has been virulently anti-Trump through the campaign. During his radio tour on Monday, Trump walked into another trap when he called into Vicki McKenna’s radio show. “You are really naïve,” an exasperated Trump told McKenna after she challenged him for attacking Cruz’s wife.

Over the past two weeks, those same anti-Trump hosts have settled on Cruz as their main alternative. When Cruz launched his efforts in Wisconsin last week, he kicked things off with a friendly in-person chat with Sykes. These influential conservative voices helped persuade listeners that Cruz—himself widely disliked by the Republican establishment—was the best choice after the leading mainstream candidates dropped out.

Cruz has also picked up a steady stream of endorsements from state legislators who once backed Rubio. Earlier this week, he won the support of Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, still a popular figure among Wisconsin Republicans even after his presidential campaign cratered.

As Craig Gilbert explained in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel earlier this month, the Wisconsin GOP is sharply divided along regional lines. The most reliably Republican part of the state comprises the so-called WOW counties of the suburbs outside Milwaukee: Waukesha, Ozaukee, and Washington. In that part of the state, Trump gets atrocious favorability marks from Republican voters, with 64 percent regarding him negatively and just 25 percent holding a positive view. While heavily Republican, those counties (and the rest of the southeastern part of the state that has turned to Cruz) tend to favor candidates from the establishment wing of the party; they voted for Mitt Romney in the 2012 presidential primary while other parts of the state went for Rick Santorum.

That’s not to say that Trump doesn’t have fans in Wisconsin. The more rural northern and western parts of the state feature the blue collar, tea party-aligned demographic that has been more favorable to Trump. But if Trump can’t get more Republicans to support him in the WOW counties, where turnout is reliably high, the talk radio bloc will likely see its favored candidate pick up a crucial win on Tuesday.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with The Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate