The Public Now Has Access to Hundreds of Videos Documenting Shootings by Chicago Police

The new database also includes audio recordings and official reports related to Taser and use of force incidents.

Brett Gustafson/Wikimedia Commons

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

 

In a move meant to boost transparency and regain public trust, the Chicago Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) made public an online database Friday that includes videos, audio recordings, police reports, and other documents related to 101 police misconduct cases currently under investigation by the agency. The move came at the urging of the Police Accountability Task Force put in place by mayor Rahm Emmanuel last December amid political fallout from the release of a video showing the fatal police shooting of black teen Laquan McDonald.

The database includes more than 300 videos from body cameras, dashboard cameras, and bystander videos, plus audio recordings from 911 calls and police radio transmissions. The materials cover 74 police-shooting incidents that occurred between January 2011 and May 2016, as well as other cases involving use of force, including against suspects in police custody. Eight of the shooting incidents occurred this year—a year in which homicide rates in Chicago have soared. [Warning: Graphic footage follows.]

Log#1058573-CHI-R-00003832 from IPRA Chicago on Vimeo.

In February, the task force recommended that the city release videos of police shooting incidents to the public within 60 days of the incident, which Emanuel said he would work to ensure was “the rule” going forward. The task force also recommended the department release videos for police use of Tasers that result in death or serious injury, as well as for other use of force incidents that result in serious injury while a suspect is in police custody.

In a press conference on Friday, the head of the police review agency, Sharon Fairley, called the release of the materials a “historic” and “tremendous effort” at transparency. She said it would not have an impact on the investigations. Emanuel said that the database was “one piece of a much larger effort” to restore communities’ trust in law enforcement, and Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said he believed the database would “go a long way in promoting transparency.”

The database is without precedent, says Karen Sheley, director of the police practices project at the ACLU of Illinois. “I’m not aware of other cities or departments that have this extensive of an online presence for their video or audio associated with police misconduct allegations,” she said. Sheley praised the launch of the database as the kind of step toward transparency that “I think everyone is hoping will be the cure” to the crisis of confidence between the public and Chicago police. “This is a dramatic change from what the police department and the city did before in relationship to videos and information about these kinds of investigations,” she said. But it isn’t the only step needed, Sheley added, to regain trust and ensure police accountability. “We need more transparency about the entire IPRA investigation process, including the outcomes of their investigation.”

This article has been updated to reflect changes to the Mother Jones style guide.

 

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We've never been very good at being conservative.

And usually, that serves us well in doing the ambitious, hard-hitting journalism that you turn to Mother Jones for. But it also means we can't afford to come up short when it comes to scratching together the funds it takes to keep our team firing on all cylinders, and the truth is, we finished our budgeting cycle on June 30 about $100,000 short of our online goal.

This is no time to come up short. It's time to fight like hell, as our namesake would tell us to do, for a democracy where minority rule cannot impose an extreme agenda, where facts matter, and where accountability has a chance at the polls and in the press. If you value our reporting and you can right now, please help us dig out of the $100,000 hole we're starting our new budgeting cycle in with an always-needed and always-appreciated donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate