The Obama Administration Is Still Targeting the Immigrants It Said It Wouldn’t Target

New government data shows enforcement in the field doesn’t match official policy.

<a href="http://www.zumapress.com/zpdwnld">Peggy Peattie</a>/San Diego Union-Tribune via ZUMA /20160524_zaf_s44_008.jpg?type=hires

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Two years ago, the Department of Homeland Security announced that it would look to deport only those undocumented immigrants who had committed serious crimes. Instead of targeting immigrants who posed little to no threat to public safety, Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson directed ICE officials to focus their enforcement efforts on immigrants who had committed a felony or several misdemeanor offenses. 

As part of its new program, known as the Priority Enforcement Program, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement also planned to limit how often it asked local law enforcement to hold immigrants beyond their release dates. That type of request, known as a detainer request, has been criticized as a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

But government data obtained this week by the Transactional Records Access Clearinghouse at Syracuse University reveals that ICE field officers have largely ignored those orders, continuing to target low-level offenders and immigrants who have never committed a crime. In the first two months of 2016, for example, more than half the detainer requests targeted immigrants with no criminal conviction. That’s actually an increase under the new program. Of those who did have a criminal conviction, drunk driving was the most common charge, and traffic offenses rank among the top five.

ICE spokeswoman Sarah Rodriquez told the Guardian that the agency could not comment on an analysis by an outside organization, but she said the agency continues to “make significant strides” in focusing its enforcement efforts on convicted criminals and people who pose a threat to public safety and national security.

You can read the full TRAC report here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate